Documents / Hearing transcript

Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.

  • p. 18 …Some of these statements which lead to mis- conceptions are: —(1) Only UFO "buffs" report UFO…
  • p. 19 …One great misconception is that only UFO buffs report UFO's; quite the opposite is the…
  • p. 25 …saw their very impressive and sur- prising UFO files, the pattern of which is entirely different…
  • p. 39 …files and modes of operation of both private and official (i.e., Project Bluebook) UFO investigative…
  • p. 41 …Misinter- preted natural phenomena (Hypothesis 3) do explain many sincerely -submitted UFO reports; but, as I…
  • p. 45 …It summarizes about 750 UFO cases in the NICAP files up to about
  • p. 46 …Reference 7 is another now -accessible source of extremely significant UFO documentation; it is unfortunate that…
  • p. 54 …Longview, Wash., July 8, 1949 Many of the UFO cases I am citing are drawn intentionally…
  • p. 60 54 terrestrial hypothesis for UFOs, incomprehensibility must be expected as almost inevitable. Hence there is more…
  • p. 63 …NICAP files. The article, by Post reporter Jimmie Woods, represents one of those rare UFO feature…
  • p. 68 …5) remarks that an astronomer working under con- tract to the official UFO investigatory program interviewed…
  • p. 70 …UFO sightings by meteorologists could be extended very con- siderably by drawing on my file of…
  • p. 72 …the UFO problem in the ensuing two-year period. Many details from the official file on…
  • p. 75 …In my files are many other "balloon" cases from the past twenty years, cases that ought…
  • p. 76 …The third target was spotted visually by myself," Hemphill's signed statement in the case -file…
  • p. 78 …25), who evidently drew his information from the official files. Ruppelt (Ref. 5) states that when…
  • p. 79 …unknowns in official files to be ignored. A famous case in UFO annals involved a B…
  • p. 86 …explanations for classic UFO cases that have been made in the official files in the last…
  • p. 91 …Official file on October 15, 1948 Fukuoka case, Project Bluebook. 43. Melbourne (Australia) Sun, December 16…
  • p. 120 …During that night, and several succeeding nights, there were many reports of UFO's over northern…
  • p. 128 …THE UFO PROPULSION PROBLEM By way of introducing the propulsion problem of UFO's, I will…
  • p. 185 179 rod N.T.TuDE tOURIE 3• MOTION OF UFO SYSTIM a..„. — 73 2.3 2…
  • p. 206 …for a UFO. This viewpoint is absolutely nonsense and the Air Force files bear witness to…
  • p. 207 …But such behavior does not imply, as the UFO addicts argue, the presence of an intelligence…
  • p. 208 …He watches the UFO for a minute or two until it finally disappears. He cannot be…
  • p. 218 …UFO presence. This can be done with existing information. Up- date and upgrade the files with…
  • p. 224 …claimed to have observed a UFO. Interestingly enough the official files con- tain fewer than 12…
  • p. 239 …Indeed, at present the scientific study of the UFO problem is greatly hampered by the circumstance…
  • p. 244 …The dotted line represents "re- liable" sightings in the files of the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization…
  • p. 245 …Many radar sightings of UFO's are on file. In a few cases, a UFO has…
  • p. 247 …He states that he has on file more than 300 UFO sightings prior to the 20th…
17
Each
of
you
are experts in
one
or
more
disciplines.
I am
sure
there
are
a
number
of
things
on
your shopping
lists
for
additional
funding.
I
would
be
interested
to
know
how
this
effort
that
is
proposed
here
might
fit
into
your
lists
of
priorities.
Thank
you,
Mr.
Chairman.
Mr.
ROUSH.
Thank
you,
Mr.
Rumsfeld.
Mr.
Miller.
Chairman
MILLER.
Doctor,
you
mentioned
a number
of
things—pop-
ulation studies
at
least.
A
great
many
of
these
are
carried
out
not
byGovernment
directly,
but
in the National
Science
Foundation
or
through
the National
Academy
of
Sciences
or
scientific
bodies
them-
selves.
Do
you
think,
I
merely
offer
this
as
a
suggestion,
perhaps
the
sci-
entific
community
try to
encourage
NSF
or
the
scientific
societies
dealing in
this
field
to take the
initiative
in
doing
this,
rather
than
to
wait
for
Government
to
take the
initiative?
Dr.
HYNEK.
I
know,
of
course,
most
of the
bodies
you
have
men-
tioned are
funded
by
the
Government anyway. Most
or
a
great part
of
our
scientific
research
today has
to
be so
funded.
Private
sources
are
certainly
not
sufficient.
And,
therefore,
I
think
it
is
rather aca-
demic,
really,
to
worry
too
much
about
who
does
it.
It
is
more
a
ques-tion
of
who
is
going
to
pay
for
it.
We
have
a
rather
interesting situation
here,
as
Congressman
Rums-
feld
has
already pointed
out.
This
is
one of
those strange
situations
in
which
the
cart
is
sort
of
before
the
horse.
Generally
this
results
in
the
scientific
laboratories
and
the
results
of
the
studies
of
scientists
finally
come
to
the
public
attention,
but
here
we
have
the other
situa-
tion.
It
is
the
public pressure,
the
public
wants
to
know
actually,
more
than
the
scientists,
at
the
moment.
So
you
are facing
public
pressures,
even,
definitely
more
than
scientific
pressures at
the
moment.
Chairman
MILLER.
Unfortunately
in
some
of our
problems, for
ex-
ample
the
NASA
problems,
where
the
public
is
indifferent,
the matter
of
waste
disposal, pollution,
health,
and
these things.
They
are
quiteindifferent
to
them, and
it
takes
a
lot
of
effort
to
get
them
interested
in
them
sometimes.
The
committee has
studied
this
on
several occasions,
but
we
have
generally
had a group
of
the
scientific
community
behind us
to givepressure,
to bring
pressure,
to get
some
of
these
things done.
Dr.
HYNEK.
I
think
we
will see,
sir,
in
this
testimony
today
that
you
will
find
a
corps of
scientists
stand
ready
to
do
this.
In
fact,
as
I
mentioned
in
my
testimony,
I
have
private
information
from a
verylarge
number
of
scientists
who
are
interested.
Chairman
MILLER.
I
think
this
one of
the values
of
the
symposium.
Mr.RousH. Are
there other questions
or
comments?
(No
response.)
Our
next
participant
is
Dr. James
E.
McDonald. Dr. McDonald
is
presently
with the University
of Arizona.
He
is
a
senior physicist,
Institute
of Atmospheric Physics, the University
of Arizona,
and has
had a long
and
distinguished career as
a
scientist.
Dr. McDonald, we
are pleased to
have you as one of our
participants
You may
proceed.

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.