Documents / Hearing transcript

Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.

  • p. 7 …of advanced technological ma- chinery manned by some kind of intelligence, that is, the extrater- restrial…
  • p. 9 …American Association for the Advancement of Science; Astronomy Society(secretary). Specialty: Astrophysics. Fields of Interest: Stellar…
  • p. 19 …The Air Force has no evidence that UFO's are extra-terrestrial or rep- resent advanced…
  • p. 24 18 (The biography of Dr.McDonald follows:) DR. JAMES E. MCDONAI,D Born: Duluth, Minn., May…
  • p. 29 …from some advanced technology sufficiently advanced to do what we cannot do in the sense of…
  • p. 32 …The possibility that these are extraterrestrial devices, that we are dealing with surveillance from some advanced…
  • p. 40 …THE UNCONVENTIONAL NATURE OF THE UFO PROBLEM To both laymen and scientists, the impressive progress that…
  • p. 48 …At first, they thought it was a jet, whose exhaust was somehow accounting for the advancing…
  • p. 59 …advanced civilization of extraterrestrial origin, the pattern of the observa- tions, the motivation of the surveillance…
  • p. 75 …To ignore most of the salient features of a sighting in order to advance an easy…
  • p. 94 …Now, if we want to assess the likelihood that there are intelligentcivilizations somewhere in advance of…
  • p. 95 …be far in advance of our own,and this,therefore raises the question of how likely…
  • p. 96 …that an advance civilization comes here very rarely. But I again emphasize the great uncertainty in…
  • p. 97 91 So, to conclude what I understand is the main reason why this committee has asked…
  • p. 100 …the possibility of its development by other civilizations. But if each of, say, a million advanced…
  • p. 101 …a race of advanced and benign creatures were devoted to our welfare. The interest in unidentified…
  • p. 111 …The possible value of contact for purposes of advancing our knowledge of our technology. Let's…
  • p. 112 …again the same possible great value from under- standing the phenomenon in order to advance our…
  • p. 116 …We must then concern ourselves with the possible consequences of contact with technologically advanced civilizations whose…
  • p. 117 111 the task. We must also 'be concerned with the risks of panic resulting in people…
  • p. 124 …Gravitation remains one of the enigmas of modern science, although there have been some advances in…
  • p. 125 …This will depend upon advances in many fields of science. Some of the things required will…
  • p. 130 …Gravitation remains one of the enigmas of modern science, although there have been some advances in…
  • p. 132 …Baker's professional society memberships include the American Associa- tion for the Advancement of Science, Phi…
  • p. 140 …There have been many debates on the technical capabilities or limits on the capabilities of advanced…
  • p. 141 135 area of forecasting the social characteristics of an advanced extrater- restrial civilization. Philosophers, social scientists…
  • p. 142 …in the environs of the earth, or to make dubious speculations either concerning "their" advanced scientific…
  • p. 143 …the gross characteristics of an advanced civilization. These studies (probablynot Government funded) should include the social…
  • p. 150 …Applications and Advanced Topics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 112-115 and pp. 376 to 392…
  • p. 153 147 00015 "Recent Advances in Astrodynamics," (with Samuel Herrick), Jet Propul- sion, 28, No. 10, 1958…
  • p. 154 …00040 "State-of-the-Art-1960 Astrodynamics,"Astronautics, 5, No. 11, 30, 1960. 00041 "Novel Orbit…
  • p. 157 …Makemson) 00071 Astrodynamics - Applications and Advanced Topics, Academic Press, New York, 1967. 00072 "Recent Advances in…
  • p. 171 …In the past five years, he has advanced from assistant bookkeeper to teller to head teller…
  • p. 174 …He has no desire to advance any further up the bank totem pole, says he never…
  • p. 189 …advanced radar systems air being de- vekii2ed for our missile defense systems, such as the ALTAR…
  • p. 190 …of the Earth or to make very dubious speculations 191, t101 either concerning "their" advanced scientific…
  • p. 203 …The primary attribute of an advanced intelligent civilization is its ability to create its own environment…
  • p. 204 …Menzel became acting Director of Harvard College Observatory and, in 1954, was advanced to the Directorship…
  • p. 207 …approach it or advances as you move away. As we look over the Air Force files…
  • p. 210 …Or at least that is the com- mon argument advanced by UFO buffs. Radar is cursed…
  • p. 212 …Life Member of American Association for the Advancement of Science. Professional Organizational Activities: State delegate to…
  • p. 217 …our level of advancement? As noted in the Special Report of the USAF Scientific Advisory Board…
  • p. 219 …Friedman has a relatively unique background in advanced technology, hav- ing been actively involved in the…
  • p. 222 …the existence of advanced civilizations. We frequently forget that the resolution of present photographs of the…
  • p. 223 …36, 37) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science is planning a UFO seminar…
  • p. 224 …reason, would not examine the data relevant to UFOs or advanced technology. Marcowitz was totally wrong…
  • p. 225 …reason, would not examine the data relevant to UFOs or advanced technology. Marcowitz was totally wrong…
  • p. 226 …B., "The Phenomenological Aspects of Magnetogasdynamic Re-entry." Presented at the 10th Midwestern Mechanics Conference, Colorado…
  • p. 227 …not alone in the Universe and surely some civilizations are more advanced than ours, but interstellar…
  • p. 233 …possible sites in advance, we could simply move in to recover the desired information after an…
  • p. 234 …The effectiveness of the proposed procedure would depend very heavily upon the amount of thought, care…
  • p. 237 …listed in advance on a 'standardized rating sheet. However this part of the experiment will not…
13
fine brain teasers and could easily be made the subject of profitable discussion
among physical and social scientists alike.
(5) The Air Force has no evidence that UFO's are extra-terrestrial or rep-
resent advanced technology of any kind. This is a true statement but is widely
interpreted to mean that there is evidence against the two hypotheses. As long as
there are "unidentifieds," the question must obviously remain open. If we knew
what they were, they would no longer be UFO's—they would be IFO's. Identified
Flying Objects! If you know the answer beforehand, it isn't research. No truly
scientific investigation of the UFO phenomenon has ever been undertaken. Are
we making the same mistake the French Academy Sciences made when they
dismissed stories of "stones that fell from the sky"? Finally, however, meteorites
were made respectable in the eyes of science.
(6) UFO reports are generated by publicity. One cannot deny that there is a
positive feedback, a stimulated emission of reports, when sightings are widely
publicized, but it is unwarranted to assert that this is the whole cause of high
incidence of UFO reports.
(7) UFO's have never been sighted on radar or photographed by meteor or
satellite tracking cameras. This statement is not equivalent to saying that radar,
meteor cameras, and satellite tracking stations have not picked up "oddities" on
their scopes or films that have remained unidentified. It has been lightly assumed
that although unidentified, the oddities were not unidentifiable as conventional
objects.
For these reasons I cannot dismiss the UFO phenomenon with a shrug. The
"hard data" cases contain frequent allusions to recurrent kinematic, geometric,
and luminescent characteristics. I have begun to feel that there is a tendency in
20th-century science to forget that there will be a 21st-century science, and indeed,
a 30th-century science, from which vantage points our knowledge of the universe
may appear quite different. We suffer perhaps, from temporal provincialism, a
form of arrogance that has always irritated posterity.
J. ALLEN HYNEK,
Dearborn Observatory, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
One great misconception is that only UFO buffs report UFO's;
quite the opposite is the case, as is the misconception that the most
baffling reports come from unreliable, unstable,and uneducated people.
Most reports of this baffling sort which I at least receive in my mail,
are remarkably articulate.
Other misconceptions are that UFO's are never reported by scien-
tifically trained people, are never seen at close range, have never been
detected on radars, and have never been recorded by scientific cameras.
It is well to remind ourselves at this point of the definition of an
UFO: those aerial phenomena reports which continue to defy expla-
nation in conventional scientific terms, even after appropriate study.
There is no point to be interested in anything else; lights at night
which might be aircraft, balloons, meteors, or satellite re-entries—
all these fit more readily into the category of IFO's or identified flying
objects.
In other words, only truly unidentified cases should be of interest.
The Air Force has its own definition of an unidentified case, and it
has many,hundreds in its files. The Air Force calls a sighting unidenti-
fied when a report apparently contains all pertinent data necessary
to suggest a valid hypothesis concerning'the cause or explanation of
the report but the description of the object or its motion cannot be
correlated with any known object or phenomena.
It is most logical to ask why do not the unidentified in the Air
Force files call forth investigative efforts in depth and of wide scope.
The answer is compound: the Air Force position is that there is no
evidence that UFO's represent a threat to the national security; con-
sequently it follows that it is not their mission to be scientifically
curious about the hundreds of unidentified cases in their own files.
97-818-68 2

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.