Documents / Hearing transcript

Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.

  • p. 18 …Some of these statements which lead to mis- conceptions are: —(1) Only UFO "buffs" report UFO…
  • p. 19 …One great misconception is that only UFO buffs report UFO's; quite the opposite is the…
  • p. 25 …saw their very impressive and sur- prising UFO files, the pattern of which is entirely different…
  • p. 39 …files and modes of operation of both private and official (i.e., Project Bluebook) UFO investigative…
  • p. 41 …Misinter- preted natural phenomena (Hypothesis 3) do explain many sincerely -submitted UFO reports; but, as I…
  • p. 45 …It summarizes about 750 UFO cases in the NICAP files up to about
  • p. 46 …Reference 7 is another now -accessible source of extremely significant UFO documentation; it is unfortunate that…
  • p. 54 …Longview, Wash., July 8, 1949 Many of the UFO cases I am citing are drawn intentionally…
  • p. 60 54 terrestrial hypothesis for UFOs, incomprehensibility must be expected as almost inevitable. Hence there is more…
  • p. 63 …NICAP files. The article, by Post reporter Jimmie Woods, represents one of those rare UFO feature…
  • p. 68 …5) remarks that an astronomer working under con- tract to the official UFO investigatory program interviewed…
  • p. 70 …UFO sightings by meteorologists could be extended very con- siderably by drawing on my file of…
  • p. 72 …the UFO problem in the ensuing two-year period. Many details from the official file on…
  • p. 75 …In my files are many other "balloon" cases from the past twenty years, cases that ought…
  • p. 76 …The third target was spotted visually by myself," Hemphill's signed statement in the case -file…
  • p. 78 …25), who evidently drew his information from the official files. Ruppelt (Ref. 5) states that when…
  • p. 79 …unknowns in official files to be ignored. A famous case in UFO annals involved a B…
  • p. 86 …explanations for classic UFO cases that have been made in the official files in the last…
  • p. 91 …Official file on October 15, 1948 Fukuoka case, Project Bluebook. 43. Melbourne (Australia) Sun, December 16…
  • p. 120 …During that night, and several succeeding nights, there were many reports of UFO's over northern…
  • p. 128 …THE UFO PROPULSION PROBLEM By way of introducing the propulsion problem of UFO's, I will…
  • p. 185 179 rod N.T.TuDE tOURIE 3• MOTION OF UFO SYSTIM a..„. — 73 2.3 2…
  • p. 206 …for a UFO. This viewpoint is absolutely nonsense and the Air Force files bear witness to…
  • p. 207 …But such behavior does not imply, as the UFO addicts argue, the presence of an intelligence…
  • p. 208 …He watches the UFO for a minute or two until it finally disappears. He cannot be…
  • p. 218 …UFO presence. This can be done with existing information. Up- date and upgrade the files with…
  • p. 224 …claimed to have observed a UFO. Interestingly enough the official files con- tain fewer than 12…
  • p. 239 …Indeed, at present the scientific study of the UFO problem is greatly hampered by the circumstance…
  • p. 244 …The dotted line represents "re- liable" sightings in the files of the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization…
  • p. 245 …Many radar sightings of UFO's are on file. In a few cases, a UFO has…
  • p. 247 …He states that he has on file more than 300 UFO sightings prior to the 20th…
161
centrocecal scotomata
larger
for the
red object than
for the
white. There
is
a
superior
temporal quadrant defect bilaterally of approximately
30
0
with
the
red
object stimulus which
is
not
present
with
the
white object.
In
reduced
illumi-
nation the
subject
is
completely unable
to
see
any of
the test
objects.
7.
Ophthalmodynomometry
was
performed
with
a
Cuilbert-Routit
dynomometer
(using
1%
Pontocaine anesthetic) with direct
vision
of the
end
point
0.D.:
70/30 units; 0.S.:
65/30
units.
There were
no
carotid bruits
orthrills;
the
simultaneous systemic blood pressure
was 140/80
sitting and
130/80standing.
8.
Opticokinetics
(using
a
one meter
by ten
centimeter red
back-
ground
cloth with
a
10
cm
X
8
cm. white check) was
performed
at
a
distance
of
one
meter horizontally bilaterally
and vertically.
The nystagmus response
in
all
directions
was
normal.
D.
Summary of
Positive Findings
1.
A
history
of
6
- 8
weeks
of tearing, misty
vision, and
photophobia.
2.
A
pale
optic nerve with absent
cupping; sluggishly reacting
pupils; impaired
red
light
reflex.
3.
Confluent
retinal mottling,
obscured
macula,
mild
red-green
dyschromanopsia.
4. Bilateral centrocecal scotomata; bilateral superior temporal
quadrantanopeia
(for
red stimulus only. Vision
in
decreased
light
(10
foot-
candles):
grossly
impaired
to
absent.
E.
Discussion and Creditability Score
The
definite retinitis, field defects
for
red
vision, and red
-green
dyschromanopsia, along with
a
history of tearing, misty vision, and photophobia
are
all
consistent with
the
diagnosis
of
tobacco-alcohol amblyonia
(Ref. 1).
Thiscondition
is
also
supported
by the
findings
in
the General Medicine Evaluation,
where other effects
of
excessive smoking and alcoholism are evident.
The subject's retinal
pathology
is severe;
in
terms
of
the
specific
event he
claims
he saw,
it
is
extreme. His "sighting" is highly unlikely because
he attaches
both color and shape
to it
in
the face of
specific defiencies
in
each
of
these areas. His attestation
about
seeing
the
object best when looking
straight
at
it
(see
Psychiatric Anamnesis)
is
uncreditable because
his
central
macular vision has been
so
severely
compromised
by
retinitis.
It
is
conceivable
that what actually happened
is that he
1)
received
a
transient visual stimulus
(i.e.,
car
or
airplane
lights)
which
2)
set off
some abnormal receptor firing
in a
damaged retinal area
and
3)
in
turn
was
misperceived.
Creditability score 5%.
Ref.
1
Walsh, F.B.: Clinical Neuro-ophthalmologr Williams
&
Wilkins, Baltimore1957, p.
1182.

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.