Documents / Hearing transcript
Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.
U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer
This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.
“UFO Files”31 pages
- p. 18 …Some of these statements which lead to mis-
conceptions are:
—(1) Only UFO "buffs" report UFO…
- p. 19 …One great misconception is that only UFO buffs report UFO's;
quite the opposite is the…
- p. 25 …saw their very impressive and sur-
prising UFO files, the pattern of which is entirely different…
- p. 39 …files and modes of operation of both
private and official (i.e., Project Bluebook) UFO investigative…
- p. 41 …Misinter-
preted
natural
phenomena
(Hypothesis
3)
do
explain
many
sincerely
-submitted
UFO
reports;
but,
as
I…
- p. 45 …It summarizes about 750
UFO
cases in the
NICAP
files
up to about
- p. 46 …Reference
7
is
another
now
-accessible
source of
extremely
significant
UFO
documentation;
it
is
unfortunate that…
- p. 54 …Longview, Wash., July
8,
1949
Many
of the
UFO
cases
I
am
citing
are
drawn
intentionally…
- p. 60 54
terrestrial
hypothesis
for
UFOs,
incomprehensibility
must
be
expected
as
almost
inevitable.
Hence
there
is
more…
- p. 63 …NICAP files. The article, by Post reporter Jimmie Woods,
represents one of those rare UFO feature…
- p. 68 …5) remarks that an astronomer working under con-
tract to the official UFO investigatory program interviewed…
- p. 70 …UFO
sightings
by
meteorologists
could
be extended very
con-
siderably
by drawing on
my
file
of…
- p. 72 …the UFO problem in the ensuing
two-year period. Many details from the official file on…
- p. 75 …In
my
files
are
many
other "balloon"
cases
from
the past
twenty
years,
cases
that
ought…
- p. 76 …The
third
target
was
spotted
visually
by
myself,"
Hemphill's
signed
statement
in the case
-file…
- p. 78 …25),
who
evidently
drew
his
information
from
the
official
files.
Ruppelt (Ref.
5)
states
that
when…
- p. 79 …unknowns in official files to be ignored.
A famous case in UFO annals involved a B…
- p. 86 …explanations for classic UFO cases that have been
made in the official files in the last…
- p. 91 …Official file on October 15, 1948 Fukuoka case, Project Bluebook.
43. Melbourne (Australia) Sun, December 16…
- p. 120 …During that night, and several succeeding nights, there
were many reports of UFO's over northern…
- p. 128 …THE UFO PROPULSION PROBLEM
By way of introducing the propulsion problem of UFO's, I will…
- p. 185 179
rod
N.T.TuDE
tOURIE
3•
MOTION
OF
UFO
SYSTIM
a..„.
—
73
2.3
2…
- p. 206 …for
a
UFO.
This
viewpoint
is
absolutely
nonsense
and
the Air Force
files
bear
witness
to…
- p. 207 …But
such
behavior
does
not
imply,
as
the
UFO
addicts
argue,
the
presence of
an
intelligence…
- p. 208 …He
watches
the
UFO
for
a
minute
or
two
until
it
finally
disappears.
He
cannot
be…
- p. 218 …UFO
presence.
This
can be
done
with
existing
information.
Up-
date
and
upgrade the
files
with…
- p. 224 …claimed
to
have
observed
a
UFO.
Interestingly
enough
the
official files
con-
tain
fewer than
12…
- p. 239 …Indeed,
at
present
the
scientific
study
of
the
UFO
problem
is
greatly
hampered by
the circumstance…
- p. 244 …The dotted line represents "re-
liable" sightings in the files of the Aerial
Phenomena Research Organization…
- p. 245 …Many
radar
sightings
of
UFO's
are
on
file.
In
a
few
cases,
a
UFO
has…
- p. 247 …He states that
he has on file more than 300 UFO
sightings prior to the 20th…
157
III.
Neuro-ophthalmologic Evaluation
A.
"Eye" History
Subject denies
previous
history
of
transient blindness,
blurred
vision, double vision, spots or
shadows before
his
eyes
or
protracted pain
inhis eyes.
His last
eye
evaluation
was
20
years ago. This
was
during
high
school and
was
prompted
by
headaches
when reading. Reading glasses
were pre-
scribed
at
that time
and
he
wore
them for
approximately eight
months and
thendiscarded
them.
He denies any
eye problems since
that time. He
states
that
both
his
parents
wore glasses
only for
reading
and that none
of
his siblings
wear
glasses. He states also
that his father
developed glaucoma
at
age
55
and
was
required
to
use eye drops
to
keep
it
under control.
There
is
no
history
of
trauma
or
infection
in the
past
five
years.
On
questioning,
the
patient acknowledges
a
mildly
irritating tearing which he has
noticed
for six to
eight weeks,
associated
with
a
slight mistiness
of
his
vision.
He
also has
been wearing sunglasses on bright
days for the
same
period
because
the
sunlight hurts
his
eyes.
B.
Qualitative Ophthalmologic Examination
Subject
is
right eye dominant.
There
is
no
evidence
of
structural
abnormality, trauma,
or
ptosis
(see
photo
in
Section
III
C
1).
The palpebral
fissure
is of
normal shape and size.
The
cornea
is
clear bilaterally but theconjunctivae show
a
moderate
degree of injection, without discoloration.
Thesclerae
are also
clear without abnormal vessels
or
pigmentation.
The iris
is
bilaterally brown.
The
pupils
are
symmetrically round, equal,
and
both
4
mm.
in
diameter.
They
reacted
to light
sluggishly and responded
to
accommodation
directly and consensually
(see
Fig. #1). The
extra-ocular muscles function
normally. There
is no
image separation upon red glass testing. There
was no
nystagmus either horizontally
or
vertically.
Funduscopic examination reveals
a
poor
red
reflex bilaterally.
There are
no
apparent floaters or
other opacities in
the
vitreous.
The
disc
shows sharp margins bilaterally but
the normal
physiologic cupping
is
absent.
There
is
a
pale quality
to
the nerve head. Both retinae show
a
confluent
mottling which completely obscures
the
macula. There
are no
hemorrhages
or
exudates.
The
arteriovenous ratio
is
approximately 5
to
1.
Gross confrontation shows no apparent field cuts and
no
extinction
to bimanual visual stimuli.
C.
Quantitative Neuro-ophthalmologic Investigation
1.
Photographs of
exterior eyes (gross):
(Taken with
a
Zeiss
1.5 F. lens from 15
cm. using strobescopic lighting). The
conjunctival injection
is
visible;
the
absence
of
pigmentation,
the
state of
the pupils, and the axis of the eyes are
clearly visible.
Cases discussed
- The Miracle of the Sun at Fátima 1917
Except for the Fatima incident... Walsh, Our Lady of Fatima - The Kenneth Arnold Sighting 1947
June 24, 1947... Mr. Arnold, reported "nine peculiar-looking aircraft" - The Father Gill Sightings at Boianai 1959
Boiani, New Guinea, June 26, 27, 1959... Father W. B. Gill - The Lonnie Zamora Incident, Socorro 1964
terrain of the Socorro, New Mexico, sighting, April 24, 1964. Zamora first sighted the object - The Exeter Incident 1965
Exeter, New Hampshire, September 3, 1965... Patrolman Eugene Bertrand - Michigan "Swamp Gas" Sightings: Dexter and Hillsdale 1966
the subsequent one in the Michigan swamps
About this file
Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.