Documents / Hearing transcript
This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.
“Paris Observatory”1 page
• 152 APPENDIX 2 THE APPLIED ASSESSMENT OF CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INTEGRITY; A METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING THE CREDITABILITY OF EYE WITNESSES AND OTHER OBSERVERS by Dr. Sydney Walker III THE APPLIED ASSESSMENT OFCENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INTEGRITY: A METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING THE CREDITABILITY OF EYE WITNESSES AND OTHER OBSERVERS I. Statement of Reason(s) for Evaluation of the Subject II. General Medical Evaluation A. Past History (medical, family, social) B. Review of Systems (i.e. cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, etc.) C. Physical Examination D. Selected Laboratory Studies (hematologic, urinary, biochemical) E. Summary of Positive Findings F. Probability (discussion plus creditability score) of Influence of General Medical Status on Observer Creditability III. Neuro-ophthalmologic Evaluation A. "Eye" History B. Qualitative Ophthalmologic EXamination: detailed, descriptive report C. Quantitative Neuro-ophthalmologic Investigation 1. Photographs (color) of exterior eyes (gross)2. Goniometry 3. Visual Acuity (quantitated) 4. Color Vision (quantitated) 5. Photographs (color) of the fund! (retina, optic nerve, etc.) 6. Visual Fields by perimetry (quantitated) 7. Ophthalmodynomometry (quantitated) 8. Opticokinetic examination D. Summary of Positive Findings E. Probability (discussion plus score) of Influence of Neuro-ophthalmoligic Status on Observer Creditability IV. Neurologic Evaluation A. Neurologic History B. Neurologic Examination C. Pertinent Laboratory Studies (biochemical, toxic metals, etc.) D. Summary of Positive Findings E. Probability (discussion plus score) of Influence of Neurologic Statuson Observer Creditability V. Psychiatric Evaluation A. Anamnesis: Detailed History plus Exploration of Attitudes and Feelings (via interview) B. Mental Status Examination C. MMPI Testing (for corroboration and additional information about personality) D. Summary of Positive Findings: Psychiatric Evaluation and Character Assessment (with supportive data) E. Probability (discussion plus score) of Influence of Psychiatric Status on Observer Creditability VI. Integration of Findings and Composite Assessment of Central Nervous System Functioning A. Summary of Specific Abnormalities with a Discussion of Their Relation to Each Other and Their Multifactorial Contribution to Observer Creditability (plus an Overall Creditability Score)
Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.