Documents / Hearing transcript

Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.

  • p. 5 …Illinois, Chicago, Ill_ 100 Dr. James A. Harder, associate professor of civil engineering, University ofCalifornia 113…
  • p. 8 …Hall, head of the Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Chicago; Dr.James A.Harder…
  • p. 27 …in Redlands, Calif., which I think Dr. Harder may be able to tell still more about…
  • p. 29 …the instance at Redlands, and perhaps Dr. Harder can fill you in in more detail. On…
  • p. 58 …of Redlands. Because I understand that Dr. Harder will be giving a fairly detailed report of…
  • p. 97 …investigate these things, I think requires some harder evidence than is now at hand. It is…
  • p. 118 …Harder, will you proceed. (The biography of Dr.Harder is as follows:) DR. J. A. HARDER…
  • p. 119 …Dr.HARDER.Thank you,Mr.Chairman. Your committee has asked me to comment on the problem…
  • p. 123 …nature? Dr.HARDER.Yes, that is right. Mr. WYDLER. All right. Dr. HARDER. In my statement…
  • p. 125 …Go ahead, Dr.Harder. Dr. HARDER. The instances in which physical fragments of UFO's have…
  • p. 127 …statement? Dr. HARDER. That concludes my statement. PREPARED STATEMENT OF DR. JAMES A. HARDER I am…
  • p. 196 …HYNEK. I will certainly grant that. Dr. HARDER. I would only respond to Mr. Boone by…
  • p. 197 …no question it can be done. Dr. HARDER. I would agree the amount of effort that…
  • p. 198 …BAKER. I have a question of Dr. Harder about the Ubatuba magnesium. Was this magnesium terrestrial…
  • p. 199 193Dr. HARDER. This was done by a neutralization analysis on a very tiny slicer. It would…
  • p. 201 …attendance of the entire series. Dr. Harder. Dr. HARDER. Following on something that Dr. Hynek said…
  • p. 203 …Baker, and Dr. Hall, Dr. McDonald, Dr. Harder, Dr. Hynek, and Dr. Sagan, I believe that…
•
152
APPENDIX
2
THE
APPLIED
ASSESSMENT
OF
CENTRAL
NERVOUS
SYSTEM
INTEGRITY;
A
METHOD
FOR
ESTABLISHING
THE
CREDITABILITY
OF
EYE
WITNESSES
AND
OTHER
OBSERVERS
by
Dr.
Sydney Walker
III
THE
APPLIED ASSESSMENT
OFCENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INTEGRITY:
A
METHOD
FOR
ESTABLISHING
THE
CREDITABILITY
OF
EYE
WITNESSES
AND
OTHER OBSERVERS
I.
Statement
of
Reason(s)
for
Evaluation
of
the
Subject
II. General Medical
Evaluation
A.
Past
History
(medical, family, social)
B.
Review
of
Systems
(i.e.
cardiovascular, gastrointestinal,
etc.)
C.
Physical Examination
D.
Selected
Laboratory Studies (hematologic, urinary, biochemical)
E.
Summary
of
Positive Findings
F.
Probability (discussion plus creditability
score)
of
Influence
of
General Medical Status
on
Observer Creditability
III.
Neuro-ophthalmologic Evaluation
A. "Eye" History
B.
Qualitative Ophthalmologic EXamination: detailed,
descriptive report
C.
Quantitative Neuro-ophthalmologic Investigation
1.
Photographs
(color) of
exterior eyes
(gross)2.
Goniometry
3.
Visual Acuity (quantitated)
4.
Color
Vision
(quantitated)
5.
Photographs
(color) of
the
fund!
(retina,
optic
nerve, etc.)
6.
Visual Fields
by
perimetry
(quantitated)
7.
Ophthalmodynomometry
(quantitated)
8.
Opticokinetic examination
D.
Summary
of
Positive Findings
E.
Probability (discussion plus
score) of
Influence
of
Neuro-ophthalmoligic
Status on Observer Creditability
IV.
Neurologic Evaluation
A. Neurologic History
B.
Neurologic Examination
C.
Pertinent Laboratory Studies (biochemical, toxic metals, etc.)
D.
Summary
of
Positive Findings
E.
Probability (discussion plus score) of
Influence of
Neurologic Statuson Observer Creditability
V. Psychiatric Evaluation
A. Anamnesis: Detailed History plus Exploration of Attitudes and
Feelings
(via
interview)
B.
Mental Status Examination
C. MMPI Testing
(for
corroboration and additional information about
personality)
D.
Summary of Positive Findings: Psychiatric Evaluation and Character
Assessment
(with
supportive
data)
E. Probability (discussion plus score) of Influence of Psychiatric
Status on Observer Creditability
VI. Integration of Findings and Composite Assessment of Central Nervous
System Functioning
A. Summary of Specific Abnormalities with
a
Discussion of Their Relation
to
Each Other and Their Multifactorial Contribution to Observer
Creditability (plus an Overall Creditability Score)

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.