Documents / Hearing transcript

Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.

  • p. 5 …Illinois, Chicago, Ill_ 100 Dr. James A. Harder, associate professor of civil engineering, University ofCalifornia 113…
  • p. 8 …Hall, head of the Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Chicago; Dr.James A.Harder…
  • p. 27 …in Redlands, Calif., which I think Dr. Harder may be able to tell still more about…
  • p. 29 …the instance at Redlands, and perhaps Dr. Harder can fill you in in more detail. On…
  • p. 58 …of Redlands. Because I understand that Dr. Harder will be giving a fairly detailed report of…
  • p. 97 …investigate these things, I think requires some harder evidence than is now at hand. It is…
  • p. 118 …Harder, will you proceed. (The biography of Dr.Harder is as follows:) DR. J. A. HARDER…
  • p. 119 …Dr.HARDER.Thank you,Mr.Chairman. Your committee has asked me to comment on the problem…
  • p. 123 …nature? Dr.HARDER.Yes, that is right. Mr. WYDLER. All right. Dr. HARDER. In my statement…
  • p. 125 …Go ahead, Dr.Harder. Dr. HARDER. The instances in which physical fragments of UFO's have…
  • p. 127 …statement? Dr. HARDER. That concludes my statement. PREPARED STATEMENT OF DR. JAMES A. HARDER I am…
  • p. 196 …HYNEK. I will certainly grant that. Dr. HARDER. I would only respond to Mr. Boone by…
  • p. 197 …no question it can be done. Dr. HARDER. I would agree the amount of effort that…
  • p. 198 …BAKER. I have a question of Dr. Harder about the Ubatuba magnesium. Was this magnesium terrestrial…
  • p. 199 193Dr. HARDER. This was done by a neutralization analysis on a very tiny slicer. It would…
  • p. 201 …attendance of the entire series. Dr. Harder. Dr. HARDER. Following on something that Dr. Hynek said…
  • p. 203 …Baker, and Dr. Hall, Dr. McDonald, Dr. Harder, Dr. Hynek, and Dr. Sagan, I believe that…
119
relativity,
in
the
past decade.
There
are
theoretical
grounds
for
believ-
ing
there
must
exist
a
second
gravitational
field,
corresponding
to
the
magnetic
field
in electromagnetic theory,
and
that
the
interaction
be-
tween
these
two
fields
must
be
similar
to that
between
the
electric
and
magnetic
fields.
This
interaction
and
its
exploitation
forms
the
basis
for
our
modern
electrical
generators
and
motors.
Without
the
interaction,
we
would
be back
to
the
days
of
electrostatic
attraction
and
of
permanent
mag-
nets—two
.
phenomena
that
can
produce
only very
weak
forces
when
operating
individually.
Some
day
perhaps
we
will
learn
enough
to
ap-
ply
gravitational forces
in
the
same
way we
have
learned to
apply
electromagnetic
forces.
This
will
depend
upon
advances
in
many
fields
of
science.
Some
of
the
things
required
will
be
enormously
increased
sources
of
power
from
atomic
fusion;
very
intense
magnetic
fields
and
current
densities,
perhaps
from
superconducting
sources;
and
ex-
tremely strong
materials to contain
mechanical
forces.
Some
of
these
advances
are
approaching,
or
are
on
the
horizon.
Others
we
have
yet
to
see
clearly.
May I
close
this
part
of our
discussion
by
recalling
the statement
that the
most
important
secret
of
the
atomic
bomb
was
that
it
worked.
This gave
the
crucial
impetus
to other nations in
their
own
efforts
toduplicate
the
research
of
the
United
States.
In
the
UFO
phenomena
we
have
demonstrations
of
scientific
secrets
we
do
not
know
ourselves.
It
would
be
a
mistake,
it
seems
to
me,
to ignore
their existence.
I
have
further
comments on
UFO's
and
high
-strength materials,
butperhaps
the
committee
would
rather interrupt
at
this
point before
I
go on
to
that second
subject?
Mr.
Rousn.
Any
questions?
I
think
you
better
go
ahead,
Dr.
Harder,
because
if
we
get
started
questioning
it is
impossible
to
stop
these people.
Mr.
BOONE.
Mr.
Chairman
may
I
ask
one
question?
Mr.
ROUSH.
Go
ahead,
Mr:Boone.
Mr.
BOONE.
Have
you
concluded that
what
you have
just told
us
is
true,
we
should not
ignore
their existence?
Dr. HARDER.
I
have
no
doubt of the
veracity
of the
observer
who
saw
this
thing in the
sky;
I
know
him
personally.
Mr.
BOONE.
I
didn't question
the
observer,
I
questioned
your remark,
and
the magnetic,
if
you
will,
electromagnetic
interactions,
and
so
forth,
when
you
said
we
undoubtedly
must admit
the
existence
of
these—I
am
sorry
I
can't
quote
you
exactly.
But
your
last
sentence
there
is
what
I
refer to.
It
does
seem
like
an
obvious
conclusion resulting
from
all
the
pre-
vious
remarks you
said
about
some
supernatural,
if
you
will
Dr. HARDER.
Oh,
heavens,
I
never suggested that,
I
hope.
Mr. BOONE.
Well,
let
me
say,
science fiction
propulsion system,then.
Dr. HARDER. Well,
sir,
what we
have been
discussing this
morning,
and
this
afternoon,
is
perhaps
closer
to
science
fiction
than anything.
I
hope
it is
more
science
than
fiction,
however.
Mr.Rousn.
Go
ahead,
Dr.Harder.
Dr. HARDER.
The
instances in which
physical
fragments of
UFO's
have been found
are disappointingly
few.
To my
knowledge, there
is
only one
well-authenticated finding,
and that
was
in Brazil, in

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.