Documents / Hearing transcript

Symposium on unidentified flying objects: hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, second session, July 29, 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives · 1968-07-29 · 256 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed record of a July 29, 1968 symposium on unidentified flying objects held by the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the U.S. House of Representatives, chaired by Rep. J. Edward Roush. The committee heard statements from six scientists: J. Allen Hynek, James E. McDonald, Carl Sagan, Robert L. Hall, James A. Harder and Robert M. L. Baker. It also printed papers from Donald Menzel, Stanton Friedman, Frank Salisbury and others. Hynek argued that puzzling UFO reports from competent witnesses deserve serious scientific study.

  • p. 12 …in a peasant society whose eyes were never turned toward the skies. Can we afford not…
  • p. 13 …for a proper and definitive study will never develop. I recall an encounter I had sometime…
  • p. 16 …A very character- istic statement by those making the reports is: "I have never seen anything…
  • p. 18 …They also usually request anonymity which is always granted. (4) UFO's are never seen at…
  • p. 19 …Other misconceptions are that UFO's are never reported by scien- tifically trained people, are never…
  • p. 20 …it has never been considered worthwhile to improve the data -gathering process because the whole subject…
  • p. 27 …he is looking at something he has never seen before. I like Dr. Hynek's phrase…
  • p. 37 …at the Ontario Hydro Commission plant has never been identified, but initially thetentative suspicion was centered…
  • p. 39 …cover- ing innumerable intriguing cases I had never before heard of, and (above all) after the…
  • p. 43 …diminish in sig- nificance, though they can never be overlooked. A frequent objection to serious consideration…
  • p. 45 …out- of-the-way rural areas but never over large cities? Why don't large groups…
  • p. 48 …Smith emphasized that they were never certain of sizes and distances, but that they had the…
  • p. 53 …is deceased), I believe that there has never been any dispute as to the observed facts…
  • p. 59 …Many other sources could be cited to show that the intimation that UFOs are never seen…
  • p. 65 …After the 'official "explanation" was publicized, he decided he'd never report another one. I predict…
  • p. 68 …In the ensuing two decades, he has never again seen anything like it. Clearly, the probability…
  • p. 69 …Moore never got a sufficiently clear view to identify any finer details if any were present…
  • p. 75 …the past twenty years, cases that ought never have been so labelled, had the evaluators kept…
  • p. 76 …Ground radar stations never detected the unknown that was seen visually and contacted by airborne radar…
  • p. 77 …strong, bright pips, said that "anomalous propagation never entered our heads as an explanation." Howard S…
  • p. 78 …7) but could never close with the unknown as its continued on its north- bound course…
  • p. 80 …All three said they had never before seen anything like it. Munger decided to phone his…
  • p. 81 …The photos were shortly taken by Base military authorities and were never seen again by the…
  • p. 87 …referred to repeatedly in Menzel's writings, never with any quantitative discussion of precisely what he…
  • p. 100 …visual observations of classical UFO's have never been made by profes- sional astronomers. For example…
  • p. 101 …how the promised political or social intervention never materializes. Psychological Factors. The psychologist Carl Jung pointed…
  • p. 125 …Oh, heavens, I never suggested that, I hope. Mr. BOONE. Well, let me say, science fiction…
  • p. 159 …He has not ever been exposed to any toxic substances, has never had to take any…
  • p. 168 …He said he had never had the experience of deja-vu episodes or of performing acts…
  • p. 171 …It never occurred to him to call anyone else's attention to the light (probably because…
  • p. 172 …He had never seen anything like it before and in fact had never previously had the…
  • p. 173 …He has taken only two sick days in the entire five years and is never late…
  • p. 174 …He never has fantasied actively taking his own life, however, and feels it would be very…
  • p. 175 …He never was one to participate in extracurricular activities, but always maintained a part-time job…
  • p. 176 …Prior to seeing that light, he apparently never experienced a deja vu, or any illusory or…
  • p. 194 …If the observer being studied is truly sociopathic and has never de- veloped a super -ego…
  • p. 203 197 This data, which most people have never seen or even heard of, is published in…
  • p. 206 …They never have had enough sCientists in the project. They have failed to follow up certain…
  • p. 221 …Isn't it true that UFOs have never been sighted on radar? No, it is not…
  • p. 243 …make such an all- inclusive negative statement. Never- theless, many of the arguments are highly compelling…
  • p. 244 …A balloon reported as a UFO was never out of sight of its launchers. A perplexing…
  • p. 247 …al- though he apologizes because he has never had the time to make a thorough search…
  • p. 249 …two leads appeared, but other witnesses could never be located), but his ap- parent sincerity was…
118
the
glasses.
Likewise,
for
light
that
had had
its
plane
of
polarization
turned
through
90
plus
180
degrees
90
plus
360
degrees,
and
so
on,
there
would
be
a
partial extinction
oilight.
On
this
basis,
the
outer
dark
ring
was
due
to
the
rejection
by
the
polarizing
filter
of
the
glasses
of
light
which
had had
its
plane
of
polar-
ization
turned
through
90
degrees,
the
next outermost
band
by
light
that
had
been
turned
through
270
degrees,
et
cetera.
This
interpretation
is
strengthened
by
Webb's
observation
that the
dark
rings
were narrower than
the
brighter
areas
between
them;
this
is
what
should be
expected
on
the
basis
of
the
above
explanation.
What
hypotheses
can
be
constructed
that
might
account
for
this
unusual
observation?
There
are
at
least
two
that
have
interesting
implications
for the
propulsion
problem.
First
by
the
Faraday
effect,
a
magnetic
field
parallel
to
the
path of the
light
could
so
rotate
theplane
of
polarization.
A
quick
calculation
using
the
properties
of
the
atmosphere
shows
that
a
field
of
200,000 gauss, operating
over
a
dis-
tance
of 130
feet
-40
meters—could
turn the plane
90
degrees;
this
is
indeed
a
very
intense
and
extensive
magnetic
field
and, of
course,
would
only account for
one
ring.
Three
rings
would
require
a
million
gauss over
the
same
distance.
We
have
been
able
to
achieve
these
field
strengths in
the
laboratory
for only
fractions
of
seconds over very small
distances.
However,
the
principal
argument
against
this
hypothesis
is
the
conclusion
that
were
such
a
field
brought
at
all
close
to the
surface
of
the
earth
its
effect
would
be
to
induce very strong
remnant
magnetism
in nearly
every
piece
of
iron within
several
hundred
yards.
This has not
been
found.
We
have
been
able
to achieve that
kind of
field
strength
for
frac-tions
of
seconds only over
short
distances
on
earth,
or
at
least
we,
on
earth.
However,
there
has been
a
suggestion
made
earlier
that
a
very strong
magnetic
field
might
so
saturate
certain
iron
cores
of
electrical
ma-
chinery as
to explain
some
of
the observed
phenomena
of
electrical
malfunctioning.
Despite the above
-described observation, there
is
little
reason to
be-
lieve
that
magnetic
fields
of
themselves, could be of
much
use in pro-
pelling
a
spacecraft,
although
there
has
been
much
uninformed
specu-
lation
about
this
in
popular
UFO
publications.
The
simple reason
is
that
we
cannot produce
a
north
pole
without
at the
same
time produc-
ing
a
south
pole.
This
is
a
consequence
of fundamental
theory.
Such a
dipole
cannot
exert
a
force in conjunction
with
a
uniform magnetic
field,
such as the earth
may
be assumed
to
have
in
a
given
locality,
though
it
can produce
a
force in
a
nonuniform
field.
To
go
beyond
the above
discussion
would be
rather
speculative,
but
it
is
just
here that
we
find
a
stimulus
and
challenge to
scientific
theory.
It
is
almost
circular
to say that
when we
find
a phenomenon
we
under-
stand but vaguely
we
have
also
found a means
of advancing our un-derstanding;
this
has been
particularly true in astronomy.
Concerning the propulsion of
UFO's, a
tentative hypothesis
wouldbe that
it is
connected with
an
application
of
gravitational
fields
that
we do not understand.
Gravitation remains one of the enigmas of modern
science,
although
there have been some advances in
its
understanding, beyond general

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 256 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.