Documents / Report
The Office of the Chief Science Advisor of Canada issued this June 2025 report of the Sky Canada Project, which reviewed how public reports of unidentified aerial phenomena are handled in Canada. It finds no cohesive, standardized reporting system, no official public platform, limited analysis and little scientific involvement. It compares approaches in the United States, France and Chile, includes a commissioned public survey, and makes fourteen recommendations, including naming a lead federal agency, creating a dedicated reporting service and cooperating with AARO, NASA, GEIPAN and SEFAA.
REPORT OF THE SKY CANADA PROJECT# 41 F. Recommendations to Enhance UAP Reporting and Research in Canada The Sky Canada Project highlights a significant gap in Canada’s approach to UAP phenomena, as most fed- eral entities lack the capacity, mandate or resources to address this issue systematically. Public interest in greater transparency and improved reporting mech- anisms underscores the need for coordinated ac- tion. Insights from non-governmental organizations, citizen-driven groups, and independent journalists reveal the enduring public fascination with UAPs and the potential value of establishing more robust frameworks for data collection and investigation. The survey by Earnscliffe (see Appendix B) found that interest in UAPs is generally moderate. However, half the respondents felt that the Canadian government should do something about UAP sightings and devote funds to the effort, including for investi- gation. The majority of respondents felt that the government should set up a service to enable Canadians to report their sightings and attached importance to transparency of informa- tion on the subject. Moving forward, the Sky Canada Project serves as a crucial foundation for discussions on enhancing federal oversight and public engagement regarding UAPs. By fostering collaboration across departments and with civilian organizations, Canada can develop a more cohesive and transparent approach to understanding and addressing these phenomena. To enable thorough scientific studies of UAP sightings, a range of data collection and investigative activities would be required. For instance, standardized protocols should be established to ensure data are comparable in their content and format. The fragmented nature of UAP reporting across various depart- ments and agencies in Canada complicates the application of scientific principles. This lack of coordination results in incon- sistent information collection across the government, making it onerous—if not impossible—for researchers to access and compile data for rigorous, science-based analysis. Additionally, the fact that investigations of reporting are not easily available, contributes to distrust and disinformation. During the Sky Canada Project, the Office of the Chief Science Advisor received about 250 inquiries from Canadians regarding various aspects of the project, including inquiries about where to report UAP sightings and requests for government assistance to interpret photos and videos, despite the Sky Canada website clearly stating that the Office was not offering that service nor collecting such information. Together, the analysis presented in this report suggests that Canada would benefit from an improved process for reporting, collecting, and studying UAP sightings. The approach should be more rigorous, transparent and coordinated than is currently the case. The following actions are proposed for consideration by the Government of Canada in order to: 1) improve coordination and analysis of UAP reports in Canada, 2) promote public trust and mitigate disinformation, 3) enhance scientific rigour and science literacy surrounding UAPs, and 4) position Canada for greater collaboration with other countries on a topic that has no geographic borders: Reporting and Data oversight: 1. Identify a lead: A federal department or agency responsi- ble for managing public UAP data should be identified. The lead should be a trusted and recognized scientific organiza- tion, have the capacity to communicate with the public and an already established international scientific network. For example, the Canadian Space Agency could be considered for such a role. 2. Establish a dedicated service: This service would collect testimonies, investigate cases and post its analyses pub- licly. It would proactively inform Canadians about UAPs. To achieve these goals, it could convene a network of govern- ment and academic partners and experts to conduct scien- tific analyses and follow up with witnesses. The example of GEIPAN in France is worth considering. 3. Enhance reporting capacity in civil aviation: Transport Canada should encourage pilots, cabin crews and air traffic controllers to report UAP sightings without fear of stigma- tization. In collaboration with NAV CANADA, they should analyze UAP reports to track trends and provide pilots with explanations, helping to reduce distractions during flights. These reports could be correlated and merged with those submitted by the public on similar sightings. Communications: 4. Support public dialogue: A proactive strategy to increase transparency and communication with the public regard- ing UAPs should be developed. Such a strategy could bring together trusted publicly facing organizations, including science centres and museums, as well as public libraries. 5. Promote intra-governmental collaborations: An internal directive to ensure collaboration among all federal agencies with relevant expertise or data would aid the lead organiza- tion in providing explanations to witnesses and correlating recent observations with previous reports. Additionally, since some departments would continue to receive reports under their mandates (for example, Transport Canada or the RCMP), they should be encouraged to forward their data as appropriate to the lead organization. 6. Improve media relations: The lead organization should play a significant role in mitigating misinformation and disinfor- mation by responding to public and media inquiries related to UAPs, and by documenting and communicating com- mon misinterpretations of observations. Examples of such approaches, including interactive digital tools, are found in other countries. 7. Promote application of up-to-date evidence to effective- ly address misinformation and disinformation: Among others, a multidisciplinary expert panel should be set up to advise the lead organization on effective approaches to countering misinformation and disinformation. Commercial aircraft at Vancouver Airport. More than 100,000 flights take place every day around the world.
Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 30 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.