Documents / Hearing transcript

Restoring Public Trust Through Uap Transparency and Whistleblower Protection

U.S. House of Representatives · 2025-09-09 · 54 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed transcript of a September 9, 2025 hearing held by the U.S. House Oversight Committee's Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna. The witnesses were Jeffrey Nuccetelli, Alexandro Wiggins, George Knapp, Dylan Borland and Joe Spielberger. They described UAP incursions at Vandenberg Air Force Base from 2003 to 2005 and a tic-tac-shaped object seen from USS Jackson in 2023. Members criticized AARO and called for whistleblower protections and the UAP Disclosure Act.

  • p. 1 …PUBLIC TRUST THROUGH UAP TRANSPARENCY AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION HEARING BEFORE THE TASK FORCE ON THE DECLASSIFICATION…
  • p. 5 …HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM TASK FORCE ON THE DECLASSIFICATION OF FEDERAL…
  • p. 7 …and I hope my colleagues on this Task Force will be able to do the same…
  • p. 8 …former director of the government’s UAP Task Force, the former head of aviation security for…
  • p. 10 …Thank you, Chairwoman Luna, Ranking Member Crockett, and Members of the Task Force, for giving us…
  • p. 12 …Good morning, Chairwoman Luna, Ranking Member Crockett, and Members of the Task Force and the Com…
  • p. 13 …I want to underscore three points for the Task Force and the Committee. Aviation and maritime…
  • p. 15 …Task Force show that the USSR launched what is almost certainly the largest UFO/UAP investigation…
  • p. 16 …UAP WITNESS U.S. AIR FORCE VETERAN Mr. BORLAND. Good morning, Members of the Task Force…
  • p. 18 …Chairwoman Luna, Ranking Member Crockett, and Task Force members, thank you for the opportunity to testify…
2
United States Air Force was covering up UAP activity at Eglin Air
Force Base.
We have heard from a number of whistleblowers, specifically
military pilots, that the reason for not coming forward publicly is
out of fear that speaking out would cost them their flight status
and potentially their careers. This is unacceptable. We cannot pro-
tect our airspaces if our best trained observers are silenced. We
cannot advance science if we refuse to ask questions. And we can-
not maintain trust in government if we keep the American people
in the dark.
Now, Congress has tried to fix this problem. Congress tried to
create formal channels through the All-domain Anomaly Resolution
Office, also known as AARO, and the intelligence community in-
spector general for servicemembers and officials to make disclo-
sures. But the reality, the reports come in are too often brushed
aside, slow-walked, or met with skepticism rather than serious in-
vestigation.
Recently, the former AARO director known as Sean Kirkpatrick
attacked our witnesses and members on this Committee. It should
be noted that he is a documented liar and brings into question
what his purpose at AARO really was if it was not to followup on
investigations and disclose his findings to Members of Congress.
A former deputy assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence,
Chris Mellon, described a report published by AARO that found no
evidence that any USG investigation, academic-sponsored research,
or official review panel has confirmed any sighting of UAP rep-
resented extraterrestrial technology as the most error-ridden and
unsatisfactory government report I can recall reading after decades
of government service.
Mellon further noted that this was a first AARO report sub-
mitted to Congress without the director of national intelligence’s
sign-off and seemingly excluded input from any scholars or experts
who have studied or written extensively about this topic, as would
normally be in any other case in this field.
Mellon determined that this report failed to fulfill the congres-
sional mandate under which it was required, omitted entire agen-
cies with known investigations or activities related to UAPs, and
omitted any discussion of efforts to hide classified or unclassified
information about UAPs. Such efforts were unaddressed by the re-
port, despite the existence of agency records and investigations con-
curring with them, including those at U.S. Customs and Border
Protection. If we set up offices and oversight bodies only to let
them become graveyards for testimony or, worse yet, ruses for pre-
tending to investigate when in actuality there was no followup,
then we are not doing our jobs.
In recent months, Congress has also been presented with evi-
dence that points to technologies that to our knowledge are beyond
our current capabilities. It is our duty as elected representatives to
follow the facts wherever they lead and to ensure that those facts
are not buried under classification stamps or bureaucratic excuses.
Let me be clear. Whether UAPs represent adversarial technology,
natural phenomena, or something beyond current human under-
standing, Congress has a responsibility to investigate. If these ob-
jects are foreign in origin, then they pose a direct threat to our na-

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 54 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.