Documents / Hearing transcript

Restoring Public Trust Through Uap Transparency and Whistleblower Protection

U.S. House of Representatives · 2025-09-09 · 54 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed transcript of a September 9, 2025 hearing held by the U.S. House Oversight Committee's Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna. The witnesses were Jeffrey Nuccetelli, Alexandro Wiggins, George Knapp, Dylan Borland and Joe Spielberger. They described UAP incursions at Vandenberg Air Force Base from 2003 to 2005 and a tic-tac-shaped object seen from USS Jackson in 2023. Members criticized AARO and called for whistleblower protections and the UAP Disclosure Act.

  • p. 34 …We have Roderick Castle and his testi- mony; Randy Anderson, his testimony; Steven Digna, and others…
18
Chief WIGGINS. My first thoughts were I think everything that
I was told and taught as a kid and a growing adult no longer, you
know, was applicable. If I am able to see something that I thought
defies gravity in such a way, then what else could be possible? That
was my first thought.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. So, did you think what you were looking at was
a weapons program that you were unaware of? Or did you think
what you were looking at was obviously some extraterrestrial piece
of technology?
Chief WIGGINS. I did not—I—neither one of those crossed my
mind. It was just in the——
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. How about now? What do you think it is now?
Chief WIGGINS. I am not the expert. I think it—I want to be as
skeptical as everyone else and just hope to know the informa-
tion——
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Did anyone in the U.S. Government tell you
what you were looking at to try to dissuade you from what you
thought it was?
Chief WIGGINS. No.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. So, no one was like, oh, you know, there was
some anomaly with the technology? No one from the government
did that?
Chief WIGGINS. No one.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. How do you think you were treated when you
reported this information or talked about—you know, the TikTok
video is well out there. It is well reported. How were you treated?
Chief WIGGINS. I have had no pushback at all. I have not had
anyone reach out to me or try to, you know, dissuade me in either
direction, militarily speaking. So, I was treated fair, and I appre-
ciate the Navy itself with assisting me with coming here to being
able to testify.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. That is good. So, what do you think the Amer-
ican people should take away from watching your video, right? Be-
cause when we watch it, obviously, right, we have never seen any-
thing like that. It defies what we know to be technologically pos-
sible. What are we supposed to think? Someone is lying about
something. Someone is hiding something, right? That is not nor-
mal, what you looked at.
Chief WIGGINS. I think what the American people should think
when seeing that video, along with others before me, is that there
is something out there, and we should know as the people what it
is.Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Right. And so, let us eliminate possibilities. So,
they did not come to you and say there was a technological error
with what you were looking at, so we put that aside, right? They
did not say it was broken. So, we look at that, and we see some-
thing. So, it is either a weapons program being reverse-engineered
by our governments or other governments, or it is nobody’s govern-
ment, and it is not from here. Those are it. Do you agree with that
assessment?
Chief WIGGINS. I agree, one or the other.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Mr. Borland, when you first experienced what
you were looking at, what did you do next? Like what was your
next step after it had passed and you were done?

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the govinfo collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 54 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.