Documents / Official release
This document, released by the Central Intelligence Agency and held by the National Archives of Australia, is an Australian Department of Defence paper from about 1971 on the scientific and intelligence aspects of the UFO problem. It traces the history of US official handling of UFOs through Projects Sign, Grudge and Blue Book, the Robertson panel and the Condon report, and it argues that a covert programme and gravity research continued. It recommends that another Australian government department take over UFO investigation from the RAAF.
From the source: Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 1971, Australia. Dated to 1971, an Australian review of the USAF Project Blue Book. This document was released by the National Archives of Australia.
7. 28 S4-pte1nber 1965 Pfaj, Gen. Ll'Bailly, Dintctor of Information, formally requested tho Air Force Scientific Advisory Board to review Project i3Lm: BOOK. The review aug::;eated tha.t the lirni tc>i! Project BLUE BO JK staff 11.nd the official inves ti,ga ting of ricer~ did not possess the tcchnicul competence Lo properly identify lne phenomena and that university tea.ms should be appoi.nted to invl'stigo.te selec tcd sightings. This cone lusion wn.s supported b:• the Rouse Armed Servic1~s Commit.tee which met on April 5Lh 1966 in the shndo.._ or a pub lie furore consequent to the USAF idf. nti ::'), ng the ,rn 11-public ised Michigan sightings as b1d.ng si.amp gas. The Colarado University 1,ns s1?lecte-d for the task and Dr Ed.re.rd U. Ccndon appointed to le,~d the project with o.n in .. tia.l allocation of $Jl) ,OOC later raised to $525,000. 19. The Colorado project became di!!Cr•}di tad when Dr Condon atr..ted publicly un 25th Janu.:i.ry 1967 that "my a.ttitude rigt..t Go,.. ie thot there's nothing to it, but I'm not supposed to reath a conclusion for another ycar 1'. The reve&l ing of a memorandum outlining a method to trick the public, ~ombined with & grnoral dis!la.ti:,fact:;.on ~t Conrlon' s biassed ai.ti tude J led to the dismissal and re:,ignation of mo•t of the staff &ftrr most of the investigations had been made but no L compll!tcly written up. The fioal report o.f' 9(:} poges lacked coherence, Condon's conclusions Wl'rc ~t variance with individual staff conclusions, although only Condon's conclusions were J>Ub lie ised. Aa a result of the Condon report, USAF c losi!d do,.n Project BLCE BOOK shortly before the .\merican Association for the Adv1rncerucn i, of' Sc iea1.:o held a special mc(iting 1,o counter-act th~ effect of the Condon report. The Chairman of the Special (;orumittuP 1 Dr Thornton Pa.gl?, was ono of tbe signatories to the Rob£rtson r(~por t. 20. Dr J. Allen Hynl?k, l!cientitic consultant to Project Blue Book 1948-69 1 bogo.n his association with n convicticm that 11.ll sightings could be conv~ntionally explainud, Even though doubts grew in his mind, he found hjmself obliged to support offjcial USAF public policy. Since 1966, ho-.;ever, he has become more outspol,en against the l;SAF attitude and has as.! i!!lcd ·to convcme both congressional hearings and scientific syr:1.pos in on the subj cc t. AHhough ini Li 1ll ly :mp port i.ng the Condon Comrai ttee he became di£illusiancd and critical of it with thP pnssng~ of time. It is quite clear that Dr Hynek along with many o thcr reputable sc i(!ntis ts do not accept the USAP explrmation of misidentifies t.ion, hyst.cr in or National ~r~ives of Australia NAA: A13693, 3092/2/00_0
Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 19 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.