Documents / Official release

CIA-UAP-003, The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance; The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954-1974

Central Intelligence Agency · 1954 · 406 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a Secret History Staff monograph by Gregory W. Pedlow and Donald E. Welzenbach of the Central Intelligence Agency, published in 1992. It gives a history of the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program from 1954 to 1974, covering the development and operation of the U-2 and the A-12 OXCART aircraft. It covers overflights of the Soviet Union, the 1960 downing of Francis Gary Powers, and later operations. One section is titled "U-2s, UFOs, and Operation BLUE BOOK."

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This CIA History Staff document chronicles the complete history of the U-2 and OXCART (A-12) high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft programs from 1954 to 1974, detailing their development, operations over the Soviet Union and other targets worldwide, the famous downing of Francis Gary Powers in 1960, organizational reforms following that incident, and the eventual transfer of operations from CIA to Air Force control. A more redacted version of this document has been available on CIA's public website.

  • p. 4 …17 The BEACON HILL Report .................................................................... 17 Concern About the Danger of a Soviet Surprise Attack ................ 19…
  • p. 13 Helen Hill Kleyla and Robert D. O'Hern. This 16-volume Top Secret Codeword study of…
  • p. 14 …view of the "other side of the hill." With the advent of dry film, it became…
  • p. 30 …Dulles The BEACON HILL Report In 1951 the Air Force sought even more assistance from scientists…
  • p. 31 …Their head quarters was located over a secretarial school on Beacon Hill, which soon became the…
  • p. 32 …et NOFOAN Chapter 1 document on 15 June 1952, the BEACON HILL Report advocated radical approaches…
  • p. 34 …Created in July 1953, the Intelligence Systems Panel (ISP) included several experts from the BEACON HILL…
  • p. 37 …sance needs ex.pressed in the BEACON HILL Report. Theoretically, he explained to the panel. any…
  • p. 41 …H. T. Friis R. Mettler A.G. Hill E. Purcell W. H. Radford E. H. Plesset…
  • p. 44 …members had been discussing since the BEACON HILL and Intelligence Systems Panel meetings. James Baker was…
  • p. 45 …Having participated in the BEACON HILL Study and the Intelligence Systems Panel, several Project Three members…
  • p. 344 …He headed the Beacon Hill Panel in 1952 and later became director of Lincoln Laboratories. PARANGOSKY…
  • p. 345 …of several advisory panels, including the BEACON HILL project. He helped Baker decide what cameras to…
  • p. 364 …BEACON HILL Report: Problems of Air Force Intelligence and Reconnaissance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 15 June…
  • p. 371 …Soviet Union 137 Beacon Hill 17-19. 21. 24, 3 1-32. 331-33'.! BEACON HILL…
47
In designing the U-2 aircraft, Kelly Johnson was confronted with
two major problems-fuel capacity and weight. To achieve interconti
nental range, the aircraft had to carry a large supply of fuel, yet, it
also had to be light enough to attain the ultrahigh altitudes needed to
be safe from interception. Although the final product resembled a typ
ical jet aircraft, its construction was unlike any other US military air
craft. One unusual design feature was the tail assembly, which-to
save weight-was attached to the main body with just three tension
bolts. This feature had been adapted from sailplane designs.
The wings were also unique. Unlike conventional aircraft, whose
main wing spar passes through the fuselage to give the wings continu
ity and strength, the U-2 had two separate wing panels, which were
attached to the fuselage sides with tension bolts (again, just as in sail
planes). Because the wing spar did not pass through the fuselage,
Johnson was able to locate the camera behind the pilot and ahead of
the engine, thereby improving the aircraft's center of gravity and re
ducing its weight.
The wings were the most challenging design feature of the entire
airp~ane. Their combination of high-aspect ratio and low-_drag ratio
(in other words, the wings were long, narrow, and thin) made them
unique in jet aircraft design. The wings were actually integral fuel
tanks that carried almost all of the U-2's fuel supply.
The fragility of the wings and tail section, which were only
bolted to the fuselage, forced Kelly Johnson to look for a way to pro
tect the aircraft from gusts of wind at altitudes below 35,000 feet,
which otherwise might cause the aircraft to disintegrate. Johnson
again borrowed from sailplane designs to devise a "gust control"
mechanism that set the ailerons and horizontal stabilizers into a posi
tion that kept the aircraft in a slightly nose-up attitude, thereby
avoiding sudden stresses caused by wind gusts. Nevertheless, the U-2
remained a very fragile aircraft that required great skill and concen
tration from its pilots.
The final major design feature was the lightweight, bicycle-type
landing gear. The entire structure-a single oleostrut with two light
weight wheels toward the front of the aircraft and two small,
solid-mount wheels under the tail-weighed only 208 pounds yet
could withstand the force of touchdown for this 7-ton aircraft. Because
both sets of wheels were located underneath the fuselage, the U-2 was
also equipped with detachable pogos (long, curved sticks with two
small wheels on them) on each wing to keep the wings level during
takeoff. The pilot would drop the pogos immediately after takeoff so
Secr&t PJOFOFU'd
Chapter 2
Seeret

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 406 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.