Documents / Official release

CIA-UAP-003, The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance; The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954-1974

Central Intelligence Agency · 1954 · 406 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a Secret History Staff monograph by Gregory W. Pedlow and Donald E. Welzenbach of the Central Intelligence Agency, published in 1992. It gives a history of the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program from 1954 to 1974, covering the development and operation of the U-2 and the A-12 OXCART aircraft. It covers overflights of the Soviet Union, the 1960 downing of Francis Gary Powers, and later operations. One section is titled "U-2s, UFOs, and Operation BLUE BOOK."

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This CIA History Staff document chronicles the complete history of the U-2 and OXCART (A-12) high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft programs from 1954 to 1974, detailing their development, operations over the Soviet Union and other targets worldwide, the famous downing of Francis Gary Powers in 1960, organizational reforms following that incident, and the eventual transfer of operations from CIA to Air Force control. A more redacted version of this document has been available on CIA's public website.

  • p. 4 …17 The BEACON HILL Report .................................................................... 17 Concern About the Danger of a Soviet Surprise Attack ................ 19…
  • p. 13 Helen Hill Kleyla and Robert D. O'Hern. This 16-volume Top Secret Codeword study of…
  • p. 14 …view of the "other side of the hill." With the advent of dry film, it became…
  • p. 30 …Dulles The BEACON HILL Report In 1951 the Air Force sought even more assistance from scientists…
  • p. 31 …Their head quarters was located over a secretarial school on Beacon Hill, which soon became the…
  • p. 32 …et NOFOAN Chapter 1 document on 15 June 1952, the BEACON HILL Report advocated radical approaches…
  • p. 34 …Created in July 1953, the Intelligence Systems Panel (ISP) included several experts from the BEACON HILL…
  • p. 37 …sance needs ex.pressed in the BEACON HILL Report. Theoretically, he explained to the panel. any…
  • p. 41 …H. T. Friis R. Mettler A.G. Hill E. Purcell W. H. Radford E. H. Plesset…
  • p. 44 …members had been discussing since the BEACON HILL and Intelligence Systems Panel meetings. James Baker was…
  • p. 45 …Having participated in the BEACON HILL Study and the Intelligence Systems Panel, several Project Three members…
  • p. 344 …He headed the Beacon Hill Panel in 1952 and later became director of Lincoln Laboratories. PARANGOSKY…
  • p. 345 …of several advisory panels, including the BEACON HILL project. He helped Baker decide what cameras to…
  • p. 364 …BEACON HILL Report: Problems of Air Force Intelligence and Reconnaissance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 15 June…
  • p. 371 …Soviet Union 137 Beacon Hill 17-19. 21. 24, 3 1-32. 331-33'.! BEACON HILL…
343
Defense Research and Engineering, John Foster, liked the concept and
provided DOD funding for ORD to develop two versions of
AXILLARY, one with a radar-homer and one with a television recon
naissance package. The radar homing system proved successful as
AXILLARY sought out and destroyed a radar during testing at China
Lake Naval Air Station. However, the end of US involvement in
Vietnam in early 1973 led to the cancellation of further DOD funding,
and AXILLARY was placed on the shelf. Melpar, Inc., continued to
work on the radar-homing version and eventually sold some
AXILLARY-type aircraft to [srael, which used them to destroy Syrian
radars in Lebanon in 1982.
PINE RIDGE
While work was still in progress on low-altitude, short-range recon
naissance systems like AQUILINE and AXILLARY, CIA scientists
and engineers were also working on a high-altitude recoverable un
manned reconnaissance vehicle with an extremely-low-radar cross
section that would enable it to fly undetected over hostile territory.
During the 1960s there had been a study conducted by the Teledyne
Ryan Aeronautical Company of San Diego on the construction of an
.unaetectable drone known as SANDY HOOK. This 44-foot long
drone would operate at 120,000 feet at Mach 0.9, with a range of
5,000 nautical miles. Its radar cross section 07zwould be 0.0 I square
meters. Project SANDY HOOK never advanced very far in develop
ment; projected high costs and substantial technical risks led to its
cancellation in December I 969.
Some of the concepts in SANDY HOOK were carried over into a
new project known as PINE RIDGE, which was a proposal for an un
manned reconnaissance vehicle with an even lower radar cross sec
tion (0.001 square meter). Research on SANDY HOOK had indicated
that a radar cross section this low was attainable and would prevent
detection and tracking by existing radar defense systems. The PINE
RIDGE proposal called for a delta-shaped vehicle, approximately
17 feet long with a 21-foot wingspan. Two vertical stabilizers would
give the vehicle an overall height of three to four feet. An existing
Teledyne J- lO0-CA-100 Turbojet engine could have been used to
power the vehicle at Mach 0.9 at the operating altitude of 65,000 to
75,000 feet. Range was estimated at 3,300 nautical miles.
Despite interest within the CIA and the Air Force for an unde
tectable reconnaissance vehicle, PINE RIDGE was never funded. In
January 1971 high-level representatives from DOD and CIA rejected
a proposal for a feasibility study to be conducted by Ryan Aircraft.
S98FCt NOfOF\N
Appendix E
~eeret

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 406 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.