Documents / Official release

CIA-UAP-003, The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance; The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954-1974

Central Intelligence Agency · 1954 · 406 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a Secret History Staff monograph by Gregory W. Pedlow and Donald E. Welzenbach of the Central Intelligence Agency, published in 1992. It gives a history of the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program from 1954 to 1974, covering the development and operation of the U-2 and the A-12 OXCART aircraft. It covers overflights of the Soviet Union, the 1960 downing of Francis Gary Powers, and later operations. One section is titled "U-2s, UFOs, and Operation BLUE BOOK."

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This CIA History Staff document chronicles the complete history of the U-2 and OXCART (A-12) high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft programs from 1954 to 1974, detailing their development, operations over the Soviet Union and other targets worldwide, the famous downing of Francis Gary Powers in 1960, organizational reforms following that incident, and the eventual transfer of operations from CIA to Air Force control. A more redacted version of this document has been available on CIA's public website.

  • p. 9 …The struggle between the CIA and the US Air Force to control the U-2 and…
  • p. 72 …2 missions. Access to the photographs taken by the U-2 would be strictly controlled, which…
  • p. 73 …This pact gave the Air Force responsibility for pilot selection and training, weather information, mission plotting…
  • p. 81 …Before the start of a mission, the ground crew set the counters to indicate the total…
  • p. 96 …All of the products from this project would be placed in the new control sys tem…
  • p. 100 …This was an S-band radar used by Soviet forces for early warning and ground-controlled…
  • p. 113 …The President nevertheless maintained tight control over the program and authorized only 10 days of overflights…
  • p. 128 …following day, when the next U-2 mission f m the Middle East. After quickly developing…
  • p. 140 …Welzenbach (S); Mission folder 4020 ( 18 March 1957), OSA records, job 67-B-972, box 7…
  • p. 142 …where they would not interfere with the control surfaces. At the ends of these poles, completely…
  • p. 147 …To take ad vantage of these weaknesses, Detachment C staged three missions from Alaska into the…
  • p. 156 …After these missions, penetrat ion overflights became a rarity. There would be only six more during…
  • p. 167 …U-2 missions. To handle U-2 material, the British created a new control system, which…
  • p. 168 …The British missions would be operationally controlled by CIA project headquarters. Soon afterward four British pilots…
  • p. 169 …where the United Kingdom carried out 27 missions during the two years its pi lots took…
  • p. 170 157 Sec, et MOF'ORI\I Chapter 3 May 1959, and used to fly weather missions…
  • p. 180 …The excellent photography from tnis mission did not reveal a single missile site, but analysts diid…
  • p. 188 …some Soviet airborne-missile fire-control systems. Operation GRAND SLAM, mission 4154 and the 24th deep…
  • p. 191 …key project personnel assembled in the Agency control center that morning (with the exception of Bissell…
  • p. 196 …in cor respondence with Abel's "wife., (probably his Soviet control) in East Germany. In November…
  • p. 204 …in .the DDP in order to maintain control of his overhead reconnais sance projects (the U…
  • p. 220 …Strongly favoring Air Force control of the U-2 missions over Cuba. the DOD representatives called…
  • p. 237 …In reality, however, the United States would maintain strict control over the missions to be flown…
  • p. 335 …The flood of information that the U-2 missions gathered led to a major expansion of…
  • p. 340 …In 1959 Bissell became Deputy Director for Plans but kept the reconnaissance projects under his control…
  • p. 348 …System-I used S- and X-band ELINT receivers to collect ground-controlled intercept and air…
  • p. 400 387 Sec1 et NOFORN mission 2023 108 mission 2029 124 mission 3086 200 mission 3088 200…
309
models. The Secretary of Defense rejected this recommendation. pre
sumably because the SR-7 l would not be operational by September
1966.""'
In July 1966, at the Bureau of the Budget's suggestion, a study
group was established to look for ways to reduce the cost of the
OXCART and SR-7 l programs. The study group consisted of C. W.
Fischer from the Bureau of the Budget, Herbert Bennington from the
Department of Defense, and John Parangosky from CIA. The study
group listed three possible courses of action: maintain both fleets,
mothball the A-12s but share the SR-7ls between CIA and the Air
Force, or mothball the A- l 2s and assign all missions to Air Force
SR-71 s. On 12 December 1966, four high-level officials met to con
sider these alternatives. Over the objections of DCI Helms, the other
three officials-Deputy Secretary of Defense Cyrus Vance, Bureau of
the Budget Director Charles L. Schultze, and Presidential Scientific
Adviser Donald F. Hornig-decided to terminate the OXCART fleet.
Concerned that this recommendation would strip the CIA of its super
sonic reconnaissance capability, Helms then asked that the SR-71
fleet be shared between CIA and the Air Force.''
Four days later. Schultze handed Helms a draft memorandum for
the President requesting a decision either to share the SR-71 t1cet be
tween CIA and the Air Force or to terminate the CIA capability en
tirely. Having just received new information indicating that the
SR-71 ·s performance was inferior to that of the A-12. Helms asked
for another meeting to review this data. His concern was that the
SR-71 could not match the photographic coverage that the A-12 could
provide. Only one of the SR-71 's three camera systems was working
anywhere near the original specifications, and that was its Operational
Objective system which could only photograph a swath 28 miles wide
with a resolution of 28 to 30 inches. The A-12's Type-I P-E camera
could photograph a swath 72 miles wide with a nadir resolution of 12
to 18 inches and oblique resolution of 54 inches. Thus, the A-l2's
camera covered three times as much territory as the SR-71 's camera
and did so with better resolution. In addition. the A-12 could fly
2.000 to 5.000 feet hig:her than the SR-71 and was also faster, with a
maximum speed of M';ch 3.1 compared with the SR-71 's Mach 3.0.""
~ OSA Hisron. ch:1p. 20. p. 130 (TS Codeword); Minnich. --oXC.-\RT Story:· p. 30 (S).
,. OSA Hiswn: ch:1p. 20. pp. 130-133 (TS Cmkword): Minnich...OXCART Swry:· pp.
30-31 (5).
= Minni<:h. '"OXCART Story:· p. 31 (SJ: OS.\ Histon·. pp. 133-13-+ (TS Codeword).
Sec, et NOFORM
Chapter 6
Sec,et

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 406 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.