Documents / Official release
CIA-UAP-003, The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance; The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954-1974
Central Intelligence Agency · 1954 · 406 pages · text from the file's own layer
This is a Secret History Staff monograph by Gregory W. Pedlow and Donald E. Welzenbach of the Central Intelligence Agency, published in 1992. It gives a history of the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program from 1954 to 1974, covering the development and operation of the U-2 and the A-12 OXCART aircraft. It covers overflights of the Soviet Union, the 1960 downing of Francis Gary Powers, and later operations. One section is titled "U-2s, UFOs, and Operation BLUE BOOK."
From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This CIA History Staff document chronicles the complete history of the U-2 and OXCART (A-12) high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft programs from 1954 to 1974, detailing their development, operations over the Soviet Union and other targets worldwide, the famous downing of Francis Gary Powers in 1960, organizational reforms following that incident, and the eventual transfer of operations from CIA to Air Force control. A more redacted version of this document has been available on CIA's public website.
“Mission Control”27 pages
- p. 9 …The struggle between the
CIA and the US Air Force to control the U-2 and…
- p. 72 …2 missions. Access to the photographs taken by the
U-2 would be strictly controlled, which…
- p. 73 …This pact gave the Air Force responsibility for pilot selection
and training, weather information, mission plotting…
- p. 81 …Before the start of a mission, the ground crew set
the counters to indicate the total…
- p. 96 …All of
the products from this project would be placed in the new control sys
tem…
- p. 100 …This was an S-band radar used
by Soviet forces for early warning and ground-controlled…
- p. 113 …The President
nevertheless maintained tight control over the program and authorized
only 10 days of overflights…
- p. 128 …following day, when the next U-2 mission
f m the Middle East. After quickly developing…
- p. 140 …Welzenbach (S);
Mission folder 4020 ( 18 March 1957), OSA records, job 67-B-972, box 7…
- p. 142 …where they would not interfere with
the control surfaces. At the ends of these poles, completely…
- p. 147 …To take ad
vantage of these weaknesses, Detachment C staged three missions
from Alaska into the…
- p. 156 …After these
missions, penetrat ion overflights became a rarity. There would be
only six more during…
- p. 167 …U-2 missions. To
handle U-2 material, the British created a new control system, which…
- p. 168 …The British missions would be operationally controlled by
CIA project headquarters. Soon afterward four British pilots…
- p. 169 …where the
United Kingdom carried out 27 missions during the two years its pi
lots took…
- p. 170 157
Sec, et MOF'ORI\I
Chapter 3
May 1959, and used to fly weather missions…
- p. 180 …The excellent photography from
tnis mission did not reveal a single missile site, but analysts diid…
- p. 188 …some Soviet airborne-missile fire-control systems.
Operation GRAND SLAM, mission 4154 and the 24th deep…
- p. 191 …key project personnel assembled in the Agency control center
that morning (with the exception of Bissell…
- p. 196 …in cor
respondence with Abel's "wife., (probably his Soviet control) in East
Germany. In November…
- p. 204 …in .the DDP in order to maintain control of his overhead reconnais
sance projects (the U…
- p. 220 …Strongly favoring Air Force control of the
U-2 missions over Cuba. the DOD representatives called…
- p. 237 …In reality, however, the
United States would maintain strict control over the missions to be
flown…
- p. 335 …The flood of information that the U-2
missions gathered led to a major expansion of…
- p. 340 …In 1959 Bissell became Deputy Director for Plans but
kept the reconnaissance projects under his control…
- p. 348 …System-I used S- and X-band ELINT receivers to collect
ground-controlled intercept and air…
- p. 400 387
Sec1 et NOFORN
mission 2023
108
mission 2029
124
mission 3086
200
mission 3088
200…
.
12
Sec,et NOFORN
Chapter 1
The Lockheed CL-282 Development Planning. According to Wienberg, General LeMay
stood up halfway through the briefing, took his cigar out of his mouth,
and told the briefers that, if he wan1ted high-altitude photographs, he
would put cameras in his B-36 bombers and added that he was not
interested in a plane that had no whe:els or guns. The general then left
the room, remarking that the whole business was a waste of his time."
Meanwhile, the CL-282 design proceeded through the Air Force
development channels and reached Major Seaberg at the Wright Air
Development Command in mid-May. Seaberg and his colleagues care
fully evaluated the Lockheed submission and finally rejected it in early
June. One of their main reasons for doing so was Kelly Johnson's
choice of the unproven General Electric J73 engine. The engineers at
Wright Field considered the Pratt aind Whitney J57 to be the most
powerful engine available, and the de:signs from Fairchild, Martin, and
Bell all incorporated this engine. The: absence of conventional landing
gear was also a perceived shortcoming of the Lockheed design."
Another factor in the rejection of Kelly Johnson's submission
was the Air Force preference for multiengine aircraft. Air Force re
connaissance experts had gained their practical experience during
" C. F. Wienb<!rg. telephone conversation with Donald E. Welzenbach. 23 July 1988 (U).
" Miller. Lockheed U-2. p. 12.
See1et
Not linked to a story yet.
About this file
Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 406 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.