Documents / Official release

CIA-UAP-003, The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance; The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954-1974

Central Intelligence Agency · 1954 · 406 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a Secret History Staff monograph by Gregory W. Pedlow and Donald E. Welzenbach of the Central Intelligence Agency, published in 1992. It gives a history of the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program from 1954 to 1974, covering the development and operation of the U-2 and the A-12 OXCART aircraft. It covers overflights of the Soviet Union, the 1960 downing of Francis Gary Powers, and later operations. One section is titled "U-2s, UFOs, and Operation BLUE BOOK."

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This CIA History Staff document chronicles the complete history of the U-2 and OXCART (A-12) high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft programs from 1954 to 1974, detailing their development, operations over the Soviet Union and other targets worldwide, the famous downing of Francis Gary Powers in 1960, organizational reforms following that incident, and the eventual transfer of operations from CIA to Air Force control. A more redacted version of this document has been available on CIA's public website.

  • p. 9 …The struggle between the CIA and the US Air Force to control the U-2 and…
  • p. 72 …2 missions. Access to the photographs taken by the U-2 would be strictly controlled, which…
  • p. 73 …This pact gave the Air Force responsibility for pilot selection and training, weather information, mission plotting…
  • p. 81 …Before the start of a mission, the ground crew set the counters to indicate the total…
  • p. 96 …All of the products from this project would be placed in the new control sys tem…
  • p. 100 …This was an S-band radar used by Soviet forces for early warning and ground-controlled…
  • p. 113 …The President nevertheless maintained tight control over the program and authorized only 10 days of overflights…
  • p. 128 …following day, when the next U-2 mission f m the Middle East. After quickly developing…
  • p. 140 …Welzenbach (S); Mission folder 4020 ( 18 March 1957), OSA records, job 67-B-972, box 7…
  • p. 142 …where they would not interfere with the control surfaces. At the ends of these poles, completely…
  • p. 147 …To take ad vantage of these weaknesses, Detachment C staged three missions from Alaska into the…
  • p. 156 …After these missions, penetrat ion overflights became a rarity. There would be only six more during…
  • p. 167 …U-2 missions. To handle U-2 material, the British created a new control system, which…
  • p. 168 …The British missions would be operationally controlled by CIA project headquarters. Soon afterward four British pilots…
  • p. 169 …where the United Kingdom carried out 27 missions during the two years its pi lots took…
  • p. 170 157 Sec, et MOF'ORI\I Chapter 3 May 1959, and used to fly weather missions…
  • p. 180 …The excellent photography from tnis mission did not reveal a single missile site, but analysts diid…
  • p. 188 …some Soviet airborne-missile fire-control systems. Operation GRAND SLAM, mission 4154 and the 24th deep…
  • p. 191 …key project personnel assembled in the Agency control center that morning (with the exception of Bissell…
  • p. 196 …in cor respondence with Abel's "wife., (probably his Soviet control) in East Germany. In November…
  • p. 204 …in .the DDP in order to maintain control of his overhead reconnais sance projects (the U…
  • p. 220 …Strongly favoring Air Force control of the U-2 missions over Cuba. the DOD representatives called…
  • p. 237 …In reality, however, the United States would maintain strict control over the missions to be flown…
  • p. 335 …The flood of information that the U-2 missions gathered led to a major expansion of…
  • p. 340 …In 1959 Bissell became Deputy Director for Plans but kept the reconnaissance projects under his control…
  • p. 348 …System-I used S- and X-band ELINT receivers to collect ground-controlled intercept and air…
  • p. 400 387 Sec1 et NOFORN mission 2023 108 mission 2029 124 mission 3086 200 mission 3088 200…
110
Sec,el NOFORN
Chapter 3
the United States delivered an oral protest concerning overflights of
Poland on 20 June and 2 July. This was followed by a protest note
from the Czechoslovak Government on 21 July. No formal reply was
sent to the two Soviet satellite states. 37
The details of the flightpaths listed in the Soviet and Polish pro
tests, along with the subsequent photographic evidence of Soviet in
terception attempts, made it clear that U-2s could not fly undetected
over the Soviet Union or Eastern Europe and could even be tracked
for extended periods of time. This news greatly disturbed President
Eisenhower. In a meeting with Allen Dulles on 19 July 1956, the
President recalled how he had been told that "not over a very minor
percentage of these (flights) would be picked up." He went on to
question "how far this should now be pushed, knowing that detection
is not likely to be avoided." After discussing the possibility of basing
U-2s in the Far East, President Eisenhower went on to say that he had
"lost enthusiasm" for the U-2 activity. He noted that, if the United
States were on the receiving end of a Soviet overflight operation, "the
reaction would be drastic." The President was also concerned that the
American public might learn of the overflights and be shocked that
their country had violated international law. He stated, "Soviet pro
tests were one thing, any loss of confidence by our own people would
• th ,, 38be quite ano er.
The President's rapid disenchantment with the project was not
lost on Richard Bissell. Fearing for the U-2 program's survival, he
met with the Land committee in early August 1956 to urge them to
help make the U-2 less vulnerable to radar pulses. His goal was to
reduce the aircraft's radar cross section so that it would be less sus
ceptible to detection. Edward Purcell had some ideas on this and sug
gested that he supervise a new project in the Boston area to explore
them. At the direction of the Land committee, Bissell set in motion a
project known as HTNAMABLE to establish a proprietary firm called
the Scientific Engineering Institute (SEI) in Cambridge. Former Air
Force Col. Richard S. Leghorn headed the SEI operation for the
Agency when it began on 26 November 1956. SEI was staffed by sev
eral MIT scholars who conducted studies and experiments into
·" .. Alleged Violations of Soviet Territory: Soviet Note of July I0, 1956 with U.S. Reply,"
US Department of State Bulletin. 30 July 1956, pp. 191-192; OSA History, chap. 11, pp.
32-33 (TS Codeword).
" Andrew J. Goodpaster, Memorandum for the Record. 19 July 1956, WHOSS, Alpha,
DDEL (TS).
Searet

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 406 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.