Documents / Official release

Congressional, White House, UFO-related Constituent Correspondence, 1998

U.S. Government · 1998 · 86 pages · text from the file's own layer

This 1998 NASA file holds UFO-related letters from constituents that were forwarded by members of Congress, together with NASA's handling records. Senator Olympia Snowe forwarded letters from Maine residents, including a 12-year-old who asked for Roswell documents and listed a number of reported sightings. Senator Charles Grassley forwarded a question about astronaut UFO sightings. NASA's reply says it has no UFO program and has not withheld anything. The reply enclosed a NASA fact sheet and James Oberg's article, which explains the Gemini-4 McDivitt object as the spacecraft's own booster.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Released with redactions. This collection of documents, primarily from 1998, contains draft and final correspondence from the White House and the offices of members of Congress responding to constituent inquiries about Unidentified Flying Objects, or “UFOs.” These inquiries cover a diverse range of topics, including alleged UFO sightings by NASA astronauts, questions regarding the authenticity of photos collected during U.S. missions to Mars, alleged improper withholding of information by the U.S. Government, questions regarding the appropriateness of “UFO-related” governmental spending, and calls for congressional hearings regarding the nature and existence of “UFOs.” The official responses consistently state that, circa 1998, the U.S. Government is not aware of evidence supporting the existence of extraterrestrial technology, and that NASA does not actively investigate “UFOs.” The collection includes references to materials of both confirmed and unconfirmed authenticity, as provided by constituents, as well as references to historical, scientific literature addressing specific “UFO” sighting claims.

!.iinc:l' all thf" m:ill.'riill ll;m.lcr used to
..prove" the r xistcncc Qf the inddcnts
werl.' public information ( Harder could
have read it in Saga, which is hardlr a
top scc;rrt )!O\'crnmcnt r:!port), his
rdcrcnce to a co\·eruμ and to sr.cret
inside informatiu,1 were clearly only
gimmicks t\1 impre~r; the news, media
with the value of his •'information".
NASA, meanwhile, says that no
such UFO event took place. The lights,
according to Dale Myers (Associate
Administrator for Manned Space
flight: quoted in a letter dated Feb. 5,
1973 to Mr. Donald Ratsch of APROj,
were spacecraft fragments: "During all
of our Apollo lunar missions. objects
have been sighted by the various
crews. Subsequent to the crew
sightings, the flight controllers
determined the observations were
probably either the S-IVB booster, the
spacecraft lunar adapter (SLA) panels,
or smaller objects such as mylar foil
particles. Because of their large size
and highly reflective surfaces, the
S-IVB and SLA panels should be
visible at great distances in the space
emironment..."
Astronaut Conrad, as quoted
earlier, claimed that the flash ing lights
were obviously SLA panels but that he
was 'joking with the ground. He
denounced the Saga story explicitly
and gave his opinion that Harder was a
"kook". Astronaut Gordon has
publicly stated that he has never seen a
UFO on any .;pace flight. Alan Bean,
the only one of the three still on active
NASA duty, issued a statement soon
after Harder's latest charges went out
over the news media late in 1975. In a
UPI dispatch:
"Astronaut Alan Bean...said that
at no time during his mission did he
ever see an unidentified objecL Bean
said that there were some metallic
parts which floated behind their sp:>r.e
craft after the Apollo-12 !Uf'l.?r module
lifled off from t~•• r:~oon. He said
these small p:.- ...•!:onauts) made an engine
burn 'f':c: metallic objects wer~ par ts
er locity simply because
they had no form of propulsion to do
so. But Conrad saw one of the "SLA
panels" (on Nov. 15th ) suddenly leave
its position at a " high rate of sμccd ...
an i:11;,ossib1lity, unless it really was a
m.lal!uvcrable spacec raft of some ::-ort.
nut where docs one find a
maneuverable spacecrait nearly
150,000 miles from the earth? The
:inswer: (excepting ,\ pollo 12 itself) in
November of 19C9 th~re weren't any.
The conclusion is inescapable: One
(possibly two) maneuverable
spacecraft not of man-made origin
were following our Apollo 12 on
November 14 and 15, 1969."
To anyone familiar with the flight
plan of an Apollo moon flight,
Conrad's words imply nothing of the
sort. Two facts must be brought to
mind. First, Apollo and the Capcom
were discussing the present position of
the SLA panels based upon their initial
separation velocities from the spent
S-IVB rocket stage. Second,. the SLA
panels break free after the Apollo pulls
off from the booster; the astronauts
then perform a maneuver called the
"turnaround" the Command Module
returns to the booster to dock with
the now-exposed Lunar Module,
before pulling the LM free from its
"garage".
Striking the UFOlogist's punctua
tion and clarifying words from the
communication, and putting it in
proper perspective, what Conrad was
saying was:
Apollo: That could be true (that
the SLA panels were flying off at one
or so feet per second), but gee whiz,
when I turned around (right after they
flew free, thirty-three hours ago) I saw
one of those SLA panels leaving the
area (of the LM "garage") at a high
rate of speed, and it looked to me that
it was leaving us pretty...at a pretty
rapid clip, like it got a lot more than a
foot per second or so.
The UFO believers' reasoning-and
the entire basis for Harder 's and for
the Saga article's Apollo-12 UFO
sighting-is phony. The most generous
description of it would be a mistake, a
misreading of the transcript's meaning
in an attempt to "prove" a UFO
incident that never really happened
outside of the fertile imaginations of
certain UFO believers. Conrad's
statement, Gordon's statement. Bean ·s
statement. and the NASA letter must
stand validated on this case: Apollo-12
was not followed by a t;FO on its
to the moon.
But how about on the way back?
"A light of indistinct shape" was
spotted just prior to re-en try,
52

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 86 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.