Documents / Official release

Congressional, White House, UFO-related Constituent Correspondence, 1998

U.S. Government · 1998 · 86 pages · text from the file's own layer

This 1998 NASA file holds UFO-related letters from constituents that were forwarded by members of Congress, together with NASA's handling records. Senator Olympia Snowe forwarded letters from Maine residents, including a 12-year-old who asked for Roswell documents and listed a number of reported sightings. Senator Charles Grassley forwarded a question about astronaut UFO sightings. NASA's reply says it has no UFO program and has not withheld anything. The reply enclosed a NASA fact sheet and James Oberg's article, which explains the Gemini-4 McDivitt object as the spacecraft's own booster.

From the source: Release of 2026-06-12 Released with redactions. This collection of documents, primarily from 1998, contains draft and final correspondence from the White House and the offices of members of Congress responding to constituent inquiries about Unidentified Flying Objects, or “UFOs.” These inquiries cover a diverse range of topics, including alleged UFO sightings by NASA astronauts, questions regarding the authenticity of photos collected during U.S. missions to Mars, alleged improper withholding of information by the U.S. Government, questions regarding the appropriateness of “UFO-related” governmental spending, and calls for congressional hearings regarding the nature and existence of “UFOs.” The official responses consistently state that, circa 1998, the U.S. Government is not aware of evidence supporting the existence of extraterrestrial technology, and that NASA does not actively investigate “UFOs.” The collection includes references to materials of both confirmed and unconfirmed authenticity, as provided by constituents, as well as references to historical, scientific literature addressing specific “UFO” sighting claims.

.
~ .
I
. . ... . ..,;. •
• , , -~,;
. .
'
.... . ; - .
.·•
·-
..• . ·=·. ~' . ' ·~·:. ;;:.,.... /~--.--: ~.-....~.. :.:,·."~.;,./•-~ . ..
"Said to be ranging lights" on Gemini-12, according to Sandler. Compare with
earlier ph.:ito showing Agena in the sunlight. Deliberate slanting of e•1idence.
... . '
.....
·:. .~
;f
reproduced with the caption: "Shot
during Gemini XII o n Novamber 13,
1966, and said to be Agena Ranging
Lights prior to docking". The
erroneous implication of these twisted
words is that this is another NASA
excuse for some remarkable UFO
photographs. Said to be ranging lights,
indeed, sneers the book!
"'that's exactly what tney were!"
Underwood told me plaintively. "They
are part of the complete sequence of
twenty photographs showi11g the
• Agena as it moves from the sunlit
side of Earth inLo the shadow".
As Underwood anJ l stood in the
photo laboratory inside buildini,: No. 8
at the historic Hou$ton sμac.:e center.
the 1;equence was rii:ht thcrt) in fro11t
of our eyes 011 the gluwin~ viewing
board. How did the '·UFO rcscarc.:hcr"
react to this expl:rnalion, [ asked°!
He continued to explain: " I took
the whole sequence with me to
Hollywood along with other films
which NASA was providing. I showed
the sequence to Sandler. He wasn't
interested. Unfortunately he went
ahead and used the phot_ographs
anyway". Thousands more people
v.-ere deceived.
The flight of Gemini-11 h:5an a
long battle between astronattt Ch:irles
"Pete" Conrad and UFO belieVPI". The
astronauts had taken three even more
remarkable photogr::iphs. "Pete"
Conrad had spotted a mor ir.g ubj..-ct
outside his ·sindow and had s.1apped
off a few frames of film, varying the
.:xpo:;ure on t•ach sh,H in an :.ittempt
to get at least 011t) ~oud ,ic·v which
wtull . :;_ :\ci;()r:] ti,;_; LO .\i I° r\,, l"'::
c:0111 pulet,. it ·soul:I ha, ,~ .::; ,~-;,;.:(J
Gemini's orhil s~v,.-ral l111 i1d;-_,J r,1;ks
t,,-ilind Lh,• $p,,,:1.'3,~\f')
Few researchers hJ\ "P. noticed. a;1d
none had recogniz,,d the significacce
of the fact, that the Proton-3 sateIii te
was only hours away from burning up
in the atmosphere. As its orbit
decayed toward a fiery doom, it
circled Earth fastPr and faster, run-r.ing
ahead of the schedule pre dicted by
NORAD.
The simple truth, oft2n ig11ored or
distorte d by many writers, is that
NORAD does not "track e\'erything in
space" like the rada:.- screens of sor.1e
air traffic control center. Inste:!d,
objects which pass through tha beatt15
of a handful of worldwide radar sitny
dcscrib.:s a sat,)lliw that looks [;;.e
Proton-3 look.-d. a.-; shown by exhibit.;
in Rus.,iail muse11111:;: a stubbv cyli.itkr

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 86 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.