Documents / Official release

UFO's and Defense What Should we Prepare For

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 94 pages · text from the file's own layer

This file, held under a National Aeronautics and Space Administration title, contains an English translation of the 1999 COMETA report "UFOs and Defense: What Should We Prepare For?", produced by a French association of former IHEDN auditors and first published in a special issue of VSD. It opens with a 2001 letter from Carol Rosin arranging a meeting. The report covers pilot testimonies, close encounters in France, GEPAN/SEPRA research and defense implications. Attached material includes a Leslie Kean article, a NARCAP description and a news item about a UFO at Barnaul airport.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: N/A. Released with redactions. NARA Record Group 255, catalogue id 413270. This file contains an independent report on UFOs written by the French association COMETA (previously published in the French magazine VDS in 1999), which details the results of a study by the Institute of Higher Studies for National Defence. The file also includes a letter from Carol Rosin in which she notes that she was spokesperson for von Braun during the last years of his life.

  • p. 39 …Livermore Laboratory, the Air Force Astronautical I Laboratory (Edwards Air Force Base), where antigravitation is also…
  • p. 83 …Air Force obscrv21ions ofan Unidentified Object in the South-Central U.S.,July 17, 1957") -Astronauria…
  • p. 84 …Scon (Edwards Air Force Base) "USAF Predicts Amimancr Propellants could be in use by early 2…
I certainties:
I - humility in noting prognostic errors committed in the past. It suffices to recall the
affirmations made by or attributed to several very great scientists: "You cannot breath in
tunnels, " "science is almost finished, " "something heavier than air cannot fly, " etc. It
I would therefore be presumptuous to claim to foresee, based on _our current knowledge and
accomplishments what might be technologies (-----) only slightly more advanced than our
own - or our own technologies in one or two centuries. Let us consider that only 150
I years ago, engines, electricity, the existence of the atom, and Hertzian waves were
unknown! We can also reread Jules Verne: Paris au XXesiecle [Paris in the 20th
Century} or Hier et demain {Yesterday and Tomorrow}. ..
I - certainties, since scientific and technical progress can only continue, supported by
I more scientists and engineers than there have ever been, spurred by competition among
nations. This competition, in our now "closed" world will focus on all of the resources that
once were free: potable water, the deep sea, the polar regions, "air, space, radio
I frequencies, etc.
Although it is risky to predict the results of an increasingly accelerated scientific and
technical development, it is, at least, almost certain that our own knowledge will have
I advanced greatly even within a few decades. There's no telling what progress will be
made beyond that time! Under these circumstances, we can conclude with a high degree
of certainty that movements of objects that at present are just beyond our capabilities will
I be technically possible within a few decades, or even a few centuries, even if the
knowledge put into play is not what we are predicting.
To the extent that the preceding conclusion is acceptable, let us go further and
I comment that only a few million years will have elapsed (barring a catastrophe) between
the appearance of man and the future stellar expeditions of our descendants ( cf. Chapter
8.3.6 and Appendix 4).
I This interval between the appearance on earth ofa conscious intelligence and the time
when we will be able to perform the same feats as those performed by the objects we are
dealing with here is infinitesimal (one to two thousand years) compared with the age of the
I earth or even with the 600 million years that separate us from the appearance of the first
living organisms at the beginning of the Cambrian period.
But the development of other intelligent [beings] on other worlds cannot have taken
I place at exactly the same rate as on earth. Ifthe age of these other worlds, like that of the
earth, is on the order of 4 billion years, and ifa conscious life [form] appeared, neither the
I
rate of its development nor the epoch in which that world was created cannot have been
exactly the same as ours.
Under these conditions, even a minuscule deviation of 0. 1%, for example, in regard to
I
these initial data would make it possible to place such a civilization between several
million years ahead ofours and several million years behind ours.
Thus the probability of the extent of development of two civilizations in the universe,
I
and in the same solar system, being equal appears to be very low, and in all likelihood we
have only two possibilities:
- our "neighbors" are several thousand or several million years behind us (or do not yet
I
exist as a conscious species), and it will be we who discover them,
- our neighbors are ahead of us, but then the probability is that this advance figures in
the thousands of years or more, rather than in years or even hundreds ofyears, and if we
can judge from the rate of our own development, their level of development would
certainly exceed our forecasting capabilities in every domain.
I
I

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 94 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.