UFO's and Defense What Should we Prepare For

Imaneuvers when the disks are detected lead one to assume that they are piloted or
operated by remote control. , ,
5. Most witnesses describe objects with a metal surface that are circular or elliptical
in shape, the upper portion ofwhich is dome shaped, flying without making any
noise in a fonnation of three to nine objects ... I
7.6.2 GEPAN/SEPRA's Work I
We do not have irrefutable tangible proof in the forrn of material, either whole or in
fragments, that confirm the physical nature of UAP Ds and their artifact character. INevertheless, the collection and expert appraisal work carried out at GEP AN/SEPRA for
over 20 years confinns the statements Genera] Twining made in 1947.
I
7.6.3 French Aeronautical Cases
IThe study ofFrench military aeronautical UAP D [sightings] (Orange in 1951, Tours in
1976, Luxeuil in 1977) supports General Twining's conclusions, namely the fourth one.
The testimonies of the pilots do in fact lead one to assume that the objects were "either Ipiloted or operated by remote control": all of the pilots reported that it was "the object"
that appeared to be moving toward them and not the other way around. Moreover, all of
them considered the maneuvering abilities of the object to be far superior to those that Ithey were familiar with.
I7.6.4 Cases of Close-Up UAP D Sightings in France
For their part, the cases ofclose-up UAP D sightings in France are very much in Ikeeping with Twining's conclusions 4 and 5. In Trans-en-Provence (Chapter 4), the
expert appraisals made at the site support the local testimony and show that the object
with a metallic appearance and circular shape landed, then took offsilently within a very Ishort space of time not very far from a wall 2.5 min height. No modem aircraft is capable
of these silent maneuvers, nor of this degree of precision when landing. It is hard not to
imagine a piloted or remote-controlled flying machine, or else one having highly advanced Icybernetics.
The other French cases ofclose encounters described in Chapter 4 also strongly
suggest the existence ofan intelligent [civilization] behind the UAP Os. In the Valensole, I"Amaranth" and Cussac cases, once the witness or witnesses are brought face to face with
the UAP D, everything generally happens very quickly, and the object escapes without
having shown the slightest aggressiveness toward the witnesses. I
7.6.5 Foreign Cases - Conclusion
IThe study of certain foreign cases leads to conclusions similar to those drawn from the
French cases. One may reread in this spirit the description of the aeronautical cases
presented in Chapter 2. We could also relate foreign cases ofclose encounters, such as I
I
I