Documents / Official release

UFO's and Defense What Should we Prepare For

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 94 pages · text from the file's own layer

This file, held under a National Aeronautics and Space Administration title, contains an English translation of the 1999 COMETA report "UFOs and Defense: What Should We Prepare For?", produced by a French association of former IHEDN auditors and first published in a special issue of VSD. It opens with a 2001 letter from Carol Rosin arranging a meeting. The report covers pilot testimonies, close encounters in France, GEPAN/SEPRA research and defense implications. Attached material includes a Leslie Kean article, a NARCAP description and a news item about a UFO at Barnaul airport.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: N/A. Released with redactions. NARA Record Group 255, catalogue id 413270. This file contains an independent report on UFOs written by the French association COMETA (previously published in the French magazine VDS in 1999), which details the results of a study by the Institute of Higher Studies for National Defence. The file also includes a letter from Carol Rosin in which she notes that she was spokesperson for von Braun during the last years of his life.

  • p. 28 …In the course of its investigation, the gendarmerie force recorded a total offour testimonies, three of…
I
Each gendarmerie force possesses a manual, the "gendarmerie handbook," which
contains all of the instructions on the procedures to be followed in the collection of data Ion unidentified aerospace phenomena. Depending on the degree ofcomplexity of the case
reported, the level of intervention may range from the simple transcript of a testimony to
an actual investigation, which may be conducted jointly with the GEP AN/SEPRA Idepartments at the locations of sightings and often results in an in-depth report.
6.2.2 Use of Data Collected by the Gendarmerie Nationale I
Once the information has been collected locally by the gendarmerie, it is forwarded in
the form ofa report to the Gendannerie Nationale headquarters in Paris, which issues a Icopy ofit to GEP AN/SEPRA. The latter processes it at two different levels:
- at the first level, the report is analyzed, then entered into a database, and perhaps is
processed statistically for the purpose of establishing classifications and typologies of Iphenomena,
- at the second level, which relates to more complex "UAP D" (category D unidentified
aerospace phenomena) cases, the investigation in the field generates a set of research Iactivities with respect to elements for furt her processing that results in the drafting ofa
detailed, in-depth investigation report~the report may be used for track interpretation
studies. I
6.2.3.Assessment and Results of the Cooperation with the Gendarmerie Nationale
ISince 1974, over 3,000 gendarmerie reports representing an average ofthree
spontaneous testimonies per document have been collected and forwarded to
GEP AN/SEPRA. Added to this are some one hundred investigations and interventions in Ithe field, conducted jointly with the local [gendarmerie] forces. AU of these have
permitted the characterization of a set of rare, natural and artificial phenomena that have
occurred with varying frequency which would not have been able to be identified without Ithis type of organization. Thanks to this collaboration, it has been possible to study UFO
cases like the Trans-en-Provence and "Amaranth" cases (see Chapter 4) under excellent
conditions, showing that there was a remnant of events the nature of which had yet to be Iidentified. A volume ofinformation describing the objectives sought by CNES in the
study of UFOs was widely disseminated to all of the regional [gendarmerie] forces.
Supplemental information and training, [end ofline cut off] direction ofofficers and Ilower-level gendarmes, is regularly provided by the Gendarmerie Nationale schools to
sensitize the [gendarmerie] force commanders to this subject.
I
IThe results of this collaboration could be more effective. Regular updating of the data
collection procedures would be desirable, as well as shorter time delays before
intervention for investigations between the time the local [gendarmerie] force learns of the Icase and the time when SEPRA intervenes. This reduction in the intervention time would
considerably diminish the loss of information, particularly with respect to effects on the
environment. It would also be important fo r the gendarmerie forces to be routinely Iinformed of the results of work and investigations carried out by SEPRA. However, the
I
I

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 94 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.