Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 6 14.0 TRAINI NG 14.1 Gemini Missi on Simulator ...........•••••••185 14. 2 DCPS (Launch abort…
  • p. 86 than the 4-C suit, but mobility in the Gemini cockpit with the 5-C suit…
  • p. 200 …GT-4 were both that way. Essentially what we are saying about the Gemini Mission Simulator…
  • p. 215 …since we had rotated so early from Gemini 4, that we could have eliminated that and…
87
ly. That bottle had a big enough heat leak so that it main
tained pressure itself. As I said, it started venting on
the 8th day. We never used the manual heater on the E'.JS
o bottle.
2
Lovell As a matter of fact, the prilna.ry o2 helped, rather we util
ized the primary o2 to pump up the pressure on the ro o2
sometime in the early pa.rt of the portion of the flight.
Borman Yes, we used the crossover valve. When you hit the squib
or when you hit the switch to open the solenoids, even
though we had been led to believe that i t takes some time
for that pressure to build up, it looked to me that it went
to about 250 in the FC o bottle almost immediately. It2
went from 100 to 250 almost immediately. I imagine it will
come down when we talk about the FC o2 problem.
Borman Secondacy o System Monitoring was nothing, we checked it •••
2
all the time, but GO/NO GO decision once a~. It stS3"ed
exactly the same throughout the entire flight--5400 and
5300.
Lovell It did not budge at all.
Borman Quanti ty meaauring.• we do not measure except for pressure,
and as we said that stayed constant. Flow rates, pressures,
end controls were nominal in the secondary o2 • You could
not tell when we had gone off the primary onto the seconda.ry

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.