Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 72 …The sea condition was very goon ; 2 to ,1. foot waves . We bobbed around, although I…
  • p. 132 …Borman The Red Sea area was one of the clear areas all the t i me…
  • p. 135 …The Suez Canal , the Red Sea, and the coast of Arabia were loud and clear the…
  • p. 136 …Lovell The Red Sea and the Gul f of Eden as it goes into the Arabian…
  • p. 140 …We evaluated them looking at the Cairo area and the Dead Sea, and I see no…
  • p. 146 …About the only area that was consistently clear was the Sahara and the Red Sea a…
  • p. 166 …You could pick out the area of the Salton Sea there even from where we were…
80 ..
Lovell The mass of the air being pushed out by the compressors is
enough to give adequate flow throughout the entire Gemini
cockl)it. We had no problems with air flow.
:Borman It would have been a very, very difficult task to stay in
those suits for 14 days, i f not impossible . We cer t ain
ly woul d have been in much worse shape when we got down.
Lovell I believe so. We were requested from Houston to try the
hose position evaluation where by the inlet and outlet hoses
we.re together.
:Borman Yes.
Lovell We tried it and to be perfectly honest, with the small cock
pit and the 8.lllount of flow out of the inlet hose, we did not
find much difference, it was adequate, but it was awkward
to use it that way. We di d find out that if my exhaust hose
was put on Frank 's side t hat we would get stagnant spots on
my side of the cockpit where although I wasn't uncomforta-
ble...
:Borman •.. that is with yo~ inl et hose being turned off. So all
these flows were introduced on my side and both the return
hoses were on my side.
Lovell That is right, they were on your side. I found stagnant
areas, I wasn't uncomfortable, but I did find stagnant area.a
where there was no flow going on on my side. You have to

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.