Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 6 14.0 TRAINI NG 14.1 Gemini Missi on Simulator ...........•••••••185 14. 2 DCPS (Launch abort…
  • p. 86 than the 4-C suit, but mobility in the Gemini cockpit with the 5-C suit…
  • p. 200 …GT-4 were both that way. Essentially what we are saying about the Gemini Mission Simulator…
  • p. 215 …since we had rotated so early from Gemini 4, that we could have eliminated that and…
77
during tape dumps. We h&d no evidence of co2• Com.fort in
~ pressure suit is compromised. It restricts mobility
and the Gemini cockpit is just not th.at big for long dura
tion flights where you can live with the suit. Suit con
trols were very a.dequate. no problems there. We bad abso
lutely no problems with the o2 demand regulator. The elec
trical umbilical is unga.inly a.nd heavy. The connection
right angle sticks out in the cockpit. It could be better
designed. We did not have fingertip lights. Our mode of
operation. with the suit on, was pr:1.ma.rily with the hood
off, the cover visor on, and the gloves off. Maey' times we
also unzipped the big zipper through the crotch and up the
back, and left that zipper open. We found that the big
opening in the neck, with the crotch zipper closed, most of .
the air would go out through the neck and would not adequate
ly vent the lower stoma.ch area. We had planned in our flighl;
plan to try going suitless. As per plan, about the second
cl&y, I got out of my suit and found after settling down to
the environment that the skin became drier. There were no
wet spots or dampness in the underwear area. I put my suit
inlet hose along side of me on the center stowage area with
the opening facing aft blowing air do-wn alongside the seat
blowing &ft. The exhaust hose was put back into its stowage

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.