Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 6 14.0 TRAINI NG 14.1 Gemini Missi on Simulator ...........•••••••185 14. 2 DCPS (Launch abort…
  • p. 86 than the 4-C suit, but mobility in the Gemini cockpit with the 5-C suit…
  • p. 200 …GT-4 were both that way. Essentially what we are saying about the Gemini Mission Simulator…
  • p. 215 …since we had rotated so early from Gemini 4, that we could have eliminated that and…
than the 4-C suit, but mobility in the Gemini cockpit with
the 5-C suit still restricts the person such that it de
grades his performance for long duration missions. It is
still quite inunobile in the 5-C suit. We still have a lot
of trouble with it. The suits checked out all right prior
to the flight. We did not do any integrity checks with the
light weight suits during the flight. The air flow
through the suit was adequate where the flow got to the
body. However, there were many pockets where the &ir became
stagna.nt, especially in the crotch area.. It would heat up
in local areas of the body and would not provide adequate
cooling. Humidity goes right a.long with temperature. The
areas where the air flow did not go across the body, was
very humid. We also noticed that it gave you sort of a wet
clammy feeling when the cool air went in there. It gave you
sort of a. cold, clammy feeling where the flow went th.rough.
Places where the air did not res.ch were hot and clammy.
:Sorman Also, the humidity in the ca.bin was very, very low when we
were in the suits. The ca.bin was dry and hot. Very, very
poor.
Lovell The humidity dew point was between 52 and 58 most of the
time. We have some accurate figures on that. I don't recall
any instance of even seeing the CO2 gauge move other than

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.