Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
74
have said, it is a very tight and fine mode. We used it
during most of the reentry. REENTRY RATE COMMAND we did
not use. DIREC~ I used for the first part of the reentry,
and it seemed that we were picking up rolling torques , and
I was also starting to pick up pitch and yaw oscillations
as the gs were coming on. They were slight ones but I
really wanted to get the spacecraft steady, end I was really
trying to lock it in on the attitude indicator, so we went
to RAT~ COMMAND. I didn't see any reason to bring back a
lot of RCS fuel anyway. REENTRY RATE COMMAND we did not use.
The PUISE mode wa.s used in the reentry prior to guidance
initiate, and it worked fine. Retrofire attitude control
was excellent and I'm gl ad we bad RATE COMMAND there because
we had no outside reference at all. Retrofire was done on
the ball with the rate needles, and I thought the rockets
were outstanding. Yes.h, outstanding, I thought they were a
little more powerful than I had anticipated.
Lovell Q;uite all right.
Borman Reentry attitude control deadbands and rate damping was
fine. The only thing, I guess, that was wrong with RATE
COMMAND was the fact that it uses an awful lot of fuel.
But, it certainly holds that spacecraft steady as a rock.
The heater lights - we solved that problem very easily. We

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.