Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
58
Lovell
Boman
J.ovel l
Boman
LoveJl
Boman
Lovell
Borman
cross range .
Did you have any kind of a mal function in the acceler
ometer?
No, but Spacecraft 6 did . I don 't remember that being
a condition of the bet.
I didn ' t either.
Ground Information . The ground gave us excellent inforl!la
tion, as f ar as everything we needed to know, inc l uding
recomputing the guidance angles after retro . The ground
did an excellent job. Tracking data, I don ' t remember
receiving that . When Spacecra ft 6 was ent ering, they
kept telling them that they were fine, a.nrl they wer e goi.ng
right down the s l ot anti everything. J do not remember
ever hP.aring from the ground on anything Jike that on ours,
do you? Perhaps we did and we were s o engrossed in flyi ng
it, t hRt we did not notice it.
Well , we had good communications pri or to b l ackout over
GuayrnRs . After we started guiding, going into th e atmos
phere, communications went t o pot.
Status of recovery. I <lo not think recovery cou1d have
been any better .
Very smooth .
7. 4 Systems Configuration
The ECS, as we said before, we had o2 HI RATF. with both

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.