Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 6 14.0 TRAINI NG 14.1 Gemini Missi on Simulator ...........•••••••185 14. 2 DCPS (Launch abort…
  • p. 86 than the 4-C suit, but mobility in the Gemini cockpit with the 5-C suit…
  • p. 200 …GT-4 were both that way. Essentially what we are saying about the Gemini Mission Simulator…
  • p. 215 …since we had rotated so early from Gemini 4, that we could have eliminated that and…
208
Fortunately, I think, that the people that you have to
work with now, Bill Tindall, and Barney Evans, are pretty
good. One of the first things I would recommend to anyone
to do, is to start talking to the Mission Planning people
as soon as they get assigned to a flight. From then on, •
keep their fingers on the flight plan. I think that is
reflected in the amount of time we spent on ours. 133
hours was spent i n that training just on preparing and
reviewing the flight plan. I think it paid off because
we ended up with one that was reasonable and one that we
coul d work wi th. I would not call it training though , as
it was sort of doing flight planning.
15.0 CONCLUDI NG COMMENTS
Borman What else do you have to say James?
Lovell We are back home, that proves the mission was a success.
Borman There is one thing that I have to say I think the system
we have set up here in FCSD now to handle these flights ,
this task force organizati on, is outstanding. I was very
well pl eased with the support we got from everybody.
Lovel l I do not think we could have done it ourselves and having
gone through i t before when we did not have the

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.