Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 6 14.0 TRAINI NG 14.1 Gemini Missi on Simulator ...........•••••••185 14. 2 DCPS (Launch abort…
  • p. 86 than the 4-C suit, but mobility in the Gemini cockpit with the 5-C suit…
  • p. 200 …GT-4 were both that way. Essentially what we are saying about the Gemini Mission Simulator…
  • p. 215 …since we had rotated so early from Gemini 4, that we could have eliminated that and…
•
Lovell
Borman
Lovell
203
like Systems Assurance and so on in St. Louie. It is a
waste of time. At St. Louis you should plan on covering
the SIM flights , the Altitude Chamber and the Horizontal
SEDR. And, down at the Cape , I thought even though we
cut out six days of testing and we did not have a Wet Mock ,
I saw absolutely no impediment at all to our launch training.
I do not think that any of it is necessary. I do not think
we cut out one necessary thing.
I think that you could use your t ime more wi sely in simula
tor training , in recovery training , and in training you
are really going to use than in study of some of the sys
tems assurance tests where you spend hours in the spacecraft
just throwing switches. You reach a point there where
you are not learning any more.
I think you should follow, at St. Louis , the SIM f light ,
the Altitude Chamber, and the Horizontal SEDR. And down
here at the Cape , we want to do the SIM flight, the Joint
Combined Systems test , the EIIV test , and finally of
course , the SIM flight and Stowage Review .
That is somethi ng which we put in, and I think ought to be
included in all._. the stowage is one thing that changes
constantly right after launch, and it ought to be put i n
just before launch. A week or so before launch to make
sure everything is correct .

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.