Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 72 …The sea condition was very goon ; 2 to ,1. foot waves . We bobbed around, although I…
  • p. 132 …Borman The Red Sea area was one of the clear areas all the t i me…
  • p. 135 …The Suez Canal , the Red Sea, and the coast of Arabia were loud and clear the…
  • p. 136 …Lovell The Red Sea and the Gul f of Eden as it goes into the Arabian…
  • p. 140 …We evaluated them looking at the Cairo area and the Dead Sea, and I see no…
  • p. 146 …About the only area that was consistently clear was the Sahara and the Red Sea a…
  • p. 166 …You could pick out the area of the Salton Sea there even from where we were…
188
Houston s imulator is that we don' t have to keep
it right up to the final confi guration. · It's a
basic trainer.
Borman It helps a lot to get in there and get the work done,
rather than not be able to get in it because it is
being modi fied to bring it up to the latest configu
ration. As long as the math f low is proper, and the
basic parts are t here, you can almost leave it the
same for every launch.
Lovell It should be updated as far as basic syst ems. We
had the fuel cell panel put in ours; we wouldn' t want
batteries, because of a lot of syst ems training on
fuel cells . That is important . We don't have to
have every little item like on the Cape simulator for
initial simulator t raini ng.
Borman I was very pleased with the Cape s i mulat or. We've had
very good work out of it, and it was right up to
the l atest s towage configuration. I believe we were
only shot down on the simulator once. It wasn' t
working perfectly every time we got in it , but at
least we got val uable training out of i t .

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.