Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 6 14.0 TRAINI NG 14.1 Gemini Missi on Simulator ...........•••••••185 14. 2 DCPS (Launch abort…
  • p. 86 than the 4-C suit, but mobility in the Gemini cockpit with the 5-C suit…
  • p. 200 …GT-4 were both that way. Essentially what we are saying about the Gemini Mission Simulator…
  • p. 215 …since we had rotated so early from Gemini 4, that we could have eliminated that and…
187
There 's one area of procedures and systems training which
can be improved, and that is t he use of more correct
procedures between ground and simulat or. A lot of time s
we got into the simulator to do a reentry or launch,
and we didn't get the parameters which you normally get
from Mlssion Control . There have been five manned l aunches ,
with t apes on all of them , where the communications bet ween
the grouno. an:l th,~ spacecraft are well documented . We
ought t o incorporate t hose in training. So you could
copy down updates, you could get the 0 ,8, you could get
systems failures and how the ground handles them , and
things of this n~tu.re. I think we could simulate them
a lot better now, especially in Houston.
Borman I think Lynn Taegart was doi ng t hat.
Lovell Lynn was attempting to follow that procedure, We
requested th1t they get some tape s from MGC from
G1-5 1 s l aunch , but by the time we left there, they
hadn't yet arri ved. Launch was very realis tic ,
Borman I don't think that we flew a simula t or with our roll
p~ogram in it and it really didn ' t make any
difference. I guess what we are sayi ng about the

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.