Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 136 …Borman We saw small towns along the coast of Mexico. Lovell Also South America. I wonder…
  • p. 169 …Borman We a l so took a seque.nce a l ong the southern coast from…
179
Borman Right .
Lovell It did complicate the pre-mission planning.
Borman Every other experiment I thought was well presented. The
experiments division, with Dick Moke helpi ng out did a good
job. I WP~ very , very satisfied in other words, with the
whole business .
13.0 MISSION CON1ROL
Borman Describe and discuss updating on the status of spacecraft and
mission.
Borman Once a day operation, where we r ead out certain parameters in
the spacecraft , reported th~m to the ground, and they have a
GO or NO GO for the r-ext area.
13.2 P1A and CLA _llE.dates
Borman They were extrem~ly easy to handle . They came up in blocks
of about 6 or 9, No problem, s i nce we dec i ded to use a
rol ling reentry in the event of contingency landing.
Lovell We had very little writing t o do .
Borman Very little writing. And I might add, based on that reentry,
i f I had to do it agai n, that is exactly what I ' d want : a
rolling reentry, i f I did not have a l oad in that computer.
Because I think it is very difficult to look out the window
and observe a horizon during a reentry . At least it was
during ours; especially duri ng a night reentry .

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.