Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 186 …GPO was very cooperative about everything. Of course, the big thing that we wanted, that we…
  • p. 219 …Everybody was very cooperative , I thought . But that was another it em that I strongly recommend…
171
•
Lovell
Borman
Lovell
:Borman
Lovell
consider using that gun again is to read down a daily
counter number, and let the people use that as a--we
ra.n into a regular nightmare. Recording drinks used and
drinks.•••
It was too much.
I think our water intake was adequate. And again I do
not think this is something we need to be hounded
about from the ground. A person seems to have enough
problems without being reminded that he is drinking enough
water; I do not see any reason at all to have this com~
plica.ted bookeeping system. The food intake was not
a problem. We recorded the food. One thing we might
note, the food was pa.eked out of sequence. So when we
got it out, we did not end up eating Day 1, meal A, B,
C, Meal 2, A, B, C, but we did always eat Meal A first,
Meal B the second meal of the de.y, and Meal C, the third
meal of the day. Although, it might be day 1, meal A,
day 13, meal E, and day 6, meal C.
Also, while we are talki.ng about food, we better talk
about the stowage of the food. It was right up to the
maximum.
That is right.
And in fact it was a little bit overboard for 14 days.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.