Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
168
wires on your head and stringing down the back of your neck,
and not expect to catch them on something in a small space
craft. Now, we found that we couldn't keep the helmet on.
I kept it on for two days, but my head became extremely hot,
and I was uncomfortable. So when I took it off I
ripped all four of the leads off. And I think that the
whole thing is extraneous a:nyway. I felt after 14 days I
was perfectly capable to judge my own condition, and my own
awareness, and my own degree of alertness I did not
need that bunch of wires hanging on my head to tell me or
to tell somebody on the ground how awake or how asleep I
was.
Lovell Inflight phonoca.rdiogram, I have no comments because it was
stuck on me at prelaunch, and it stayed on me during the
entire flight.
Borman Well, did it bother you? Did you get any sensor problems?
Lovell No.
11.12 Bioassay body fluids (M-5) and calcium balance study (M-7)
Borman Urine samplings bags, well, actually the bags were pretty
good. We had one break around the head. Marking was all
right a.nd stowage was fine. I might point out that the
tracer accumulator we changed with no problem. The mixing
bag was all right, but they left out the most important
thing here, the condom device that we used to

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.