Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
167
period, was that we did not want to have the people say,
"Well, you did not run it the whole time so the experiment
was not valid." We left it on and put up with it in the
hope that we could get rid of it once and for all.
Lovell Obviously, it did not work.
:Borman So far as we know it did not make any dif£erence. And
it did not seem to make any difference inflight or post
flight.
Lovell It was a waste of time.
11.10 In-flight exerciser (M-3)
:Borman It is a valuable piece of equipment. We used it not only
for the crew status passes, we exercised with it 3 times
a day and I thought i t was vecy worthwhile. It is a
simple piece of gear but it is a good device. Right?
Lovell Although, I imagine we can improve on exercise equipment
in the future spacecraft.
:Borman Perhaps, the biggest deteriorati on that we noted in the
muscles was in our legs, and that exerciser was-I do not
know how you can improve on that much.
11.11 In- f l i ght phonocardiogram (M-4) and In-flight sleep
analysis (M-8)
Borman Well, the equipment problems with M-8 were that the thi ng
is operationally incongruous. You cannot have those

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.