Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
No. 1) i t did not have as much l ight gathering as was
required for thi s particul ar equipment. It should have
a l arger magni f i cati on. 2) It had a green f il t er over it
whi ch was s upposed to enhance picki ng up the beam , but
a l l it di d was f ade out everything . You could not see
terrain features a.nd you needed to see · terrain features
t o find out where that beam was located .
Borman Yes. to know where the beam was.
Love l l You coul d l ook out a.nd .. .. we had photographs of the area
where the beam shoul d be coming from. And we coul d acquire
i t by our naked eye by just looki.ng out and seeing i t.
But.as soon as you went to the telescope of the l aser,
everything faded out to this green color. Unl ess you
just happened to pi ck up the beam you're l ost and I never
was ab l e to pick up the beam thru the t el esc ope . The
filter was just too stro.ng . I much prefer to have a c lear
view . So I coul d pick out the terrain features . The
reticle of course ....
Borman Of course. we knew that was shot before we took off.
Lovell We never had a good check of t his thi.ng t hought at night,
and I wish we had had a good night pass over something,
but we never did. Because I fee l that we probab l y cou l d
have probabl y picked up the beam a l ot better at night.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.