Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
162
we were, when we went by there , and saw two blinks of the
laser. We had the photograph in front of us marking where
the laser was located. We saw Holoman , we saw White Sands
but we never did see the beam except the short flashes .
Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank
or I suspected after our briefings by the experimenters a nd
by ac t ually looking at one at Houston. Obviously this
laser at Houston was a lot shorter and can be very much
magnified.
Borman Tracking was no problem ~
We acquired one over Hawaii; we were able to
t r ack it easily. The pr oblem is acquisition of the light .
Lovell The light beam is a lot smaller point than we suspected.
Borman And then again the big bugaboo in this whole experiment
was weather. Ascension never got up, we never got ground
equipment at Ascension. We never got really good passes
at White Sands because we were a l ways about 300 mil es South .
And Hawaii was available to us on only 2 passes . We
a cquired the laser on both passes, but were not able to
get the handheld laser on the beam on the ground .
Borman Okay, how about the field of view?
Lovell The field of view. Well , let me t alk a bout the equipment .
Basically the equipment was fine , except for the telescopes

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.