Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 72 …The sea condition was very goon ; 2 to ,1. foot waves . We bobbed around, although I…
  • p. 132 …Borman The Red Sea area was one of the clear areas all the t i me…
  • p. 135 …The Suez Canal , the Red Sea, and the coast of Arabia were loud and clear the…
  • p. 136 …Lovell The Red Sea and the Gul f of Eden as it goes into the Arabian…
  • p. 140 …We evaluated them looking at the Cairo area and the Dead Sea, and I see no…
  • p. 146 …About the only area that was consistently clear was the Sahara and the Red Sea a…
  • p. 166 …You could pick out the area of the Salton Sea there even from where we were…
152
Borman Even though you know the star very wel l , using the system
of estimating the angl e i n ahea d of time, you l eave your
s el f open to picking the wrong s t ars.
Lovell Yes, one of the big things about t he sextant is you have
t o be sure you can identify the star when you are looking
inside t he sextant after you get the thing down because
you might get the wrong star. That is why you should use
stars in sextant navigation that have identifying features
in the fie l d of vi ew of the sextant. For instance Capella
was a very good one because it has the 3 littl e stars
around i t, I guess there were 2 stars, I forget .
Borman Three stars .
Lovell Three stars , but anyway you coul d tel l Capella when you
looked through the sextant!But,a star that was a l l out by
itself, even though it was bright,you really could not
tell whether tha t was a star or not until you went out
and l ooked again,and tha t was sort of difficult .
Borman We did not have any radar but I know darn wel l , if I was
out trying t o ef fect a rendezvous , I woul d much rather
have an operati.ng radar wi th range and range rate than I
would that s extant.
Lovell Wel l the thi.ng i s: there are a l ot of f ac tors that
affect t his thing: window g l are , the f act that we had to
t urn on white light everytime we got a reading, because

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.