Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
151
Lovell
Borman
Lovell
Borman ·
Lovell
On no Moon nights, the whole a i r glow layer seemed to be
of the same consista.ncy. And the sharpest part was t he
upper air glow l ayer where we could bring stars down to it.
Did you f ind it difficult at times to get the stars
acquir ed at the angle?
Right. We found out, due to the window design, tllat if
the stars were not lined vertically with one another, if
we were taking star to star shots or star to Moon shots ,
i t was hard to get the sextant lined up. The best way to
hold the sextant was t he way it was developed originally,
just up a.nd down. If you had to move it around here to
get a star over here,or horizontal or angle shots,
you had to move the spacecraft around to get the window
in line, to get all the view. Now we ooul d shoot angl es
up to about I think 45 degrees, if we had the right window
alignment and had bright enough stars. But anything above
that and most of the time around 35 to 40 degrees, one of
the two, either the upper prism or t he l ower t elescope
woul d get in the way of t he rim of the window and get
lost to view . Then we couldn't do anything with it .
I remember there were a couple of t imes when you picked
up the wrong star too.
Yes.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.