Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
123
Lovell Right. Weather is the big bugaboo on Apollo landmarks, or
using earth land.marks for Apollo.
Borman The acquisition data was good. The pointing data was good
on all the experiment updates, except for one. They missed
the time on an S-5. We caught it, and did it ourselves be
cause we knew where the a.rea was supposed to be. The point
ing data given was great throughout the flight. The updat
ing wa.s fine. We bad no problem.a at all. Pointing instruc
t ions were good.
Borman Concerning taking acquisiti on photographs for the Apollo
l andmarks, it was pretty dam hard to determine anyt hing
when we pitched 30 degrees down to pick up the landmarks.
We could not pick out the air f i elds or anything. We would
point the camera and take a picture, but we did not lmow
what we were taking pictures of. We could not see it with
the naked eye. I am thinking of the airfield in Brazil.
We took this acquisition picture without any idea of what
we were taking a picture of until we finally got to the
nadir. Then, we looked down and could see the runw~. I
think it was in Belam Province in Brazil . The weather was
a very definite f actor in photographing the Apollo l a.nd
ma.rks, and of course, it wuld be a very definite factor in
using the Apollo landmarks o
Lovell We had to use the sun angl e that we had at the time we got

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.