Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
119
lasted 14 days. We could have lasted a lot longer on the
food. But that does not mean there is not room for improve-
ment.
Borman The concept, as far as packaging and everything goes, is
good. What is lacking now is really an adequate quality
control for uniformity. If everyone of the food bags had
been as good as the good ones, there would have been no
problem. Some of them did not have velcro on the.m, some
of them burst, and that sort of thing.
Lovell You could get the soups out of the spout very easily, but
trying to get tuna salad and shrimp and sauce out of there
was a real job. We should change the size of the spout
according to the type of food we have. We noticed at the
beginning of the flight that dry solids were especially bad.
Borman Yes . Beef bites and bacon and egg bites are horrible and
should be deleted from the menu.
Lovell GT-5 reported that the beef bites were crumbly. Every
single package of beef bites that I got out was crumbs.
They would float all over the place, and you had to get out
your exhaust hose and gather them all up again and throw
the.m away. If we did not ba.ve that technique, did not have
the screens on the exhaust hoses, they would either go into
the ECS sys te.m or float around. I could see where GT-5
got an awful lot of crumbs floating around.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.