Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 124 …Lovell We never had any l arge amounts of dandruff or anything floating around. Borman The…
117
actually. You left it right over the circuit breaker panel,
didn't you? Did it come out during reentry?
Lovell No. There was no problem.
Borman There is no water problem.
Lovell There might have been a little air in it because we got air
in the food all the time. I do not know how it got in
because the food packages were evacuated. We would put the
gun in and pump it up with water, and yet there was air in
the food every time you opened it up. There was probably1
some air in the water, but it did not bother us too much.
Borman No. I thought it was a minimum amount , too. The water
tasted good. It was cool• The gun, as we have already
commented, was very adequate. I think it is inconceivable
that we continue to have to log drinks the way we did. I
think if people want to know how much water you drink, you
can read them off the counter on the gun, and that is it.
We went crazy logging these things by numbers and counter
numbers and everything else. It is operationally unacceptable.
Lovell For flights that are not primarily medical all they have to
have is a counter reading once or twice a day for the systems
p~opls, They could just divide it by the number of crew and
come out very close to what the actual consumption per man
i s .
Borman The food , I thought , was by and large very good. One

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.