Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
106
light. The center panel and the right panel were all right.
There is no question that the lighting system on the LEM is
superior.
Lovell We used the red lighting more than I thought we would ever
use it. We never used it in simulations. The red lighting
turned out ve-ry nicely when we started looking out the
window, using the stars, getting oriented and things of this
nature.
Borman The pedestal, console and circuit breaker areas just aren't
lit. Same way with the water management panel, when you
wanted to check that,the only thing you could do was use
your flashlight. It was not a big problem. The little
flashlight that CSD developed, and put in, was one of the
most valuable pieces of gear we had. We used it continually
throughout the flight, it is much more valuable than finger
tip lights. I see no reason for fingertip lights because
you're not going to fly with gloves on most of the time.
If we would have had them, they would have been stowed.
This little flashlight turned out to be a little jewel. The
utility light I did not use once in the whole flight.
Lovel l I turned mine on once to see if it worked.
Borman The flashlight was much easier to get to. We velcroed it
right in front of us, and it was very handy. And at the
end of 14 days it seemed as bright as it was before. One

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.