Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 25 15 Borman Could you identify any type of the debris? Lovell No, pieces.That is all…
  • p. 61 …LoveJl Frank thought it was in the reef ed con<lition for 3 months . Borman It…
  • p. 64 …Meanwhile , Frank ' s got the checklist out and the guys out there are putting on the…
  • p. 83 …Lovell We might mention here that both Frank and I think making adjust maneuvers without a…
  • p. 90 …We had no problems with air flow. :Borman It would have been a very, very difficult…
  • p. 93 …When I was out of the suit and Frank was in it, we put my suit…
  • p. 118 …Lovell Frank's was better than mine. Whenever I could I would give him the cameras…
  • p. 125 …Lovell It was a necessary evil, Frank. Borman We were a little concerned when we opened…
  • p. 141 131 Borman The reception on HF during the fl i ght was very poor. Lovell Right…
  • p. 172 …Lovell The magnitude of this laser is a lot less than either Frank or I suspected…
98
Borman The onboard cues for monitoring the el ectrical system are
adequate. We found out one thing in this f light , t hat is
the Delt a Plight s really don't mean a lot . We had been
told before the flight never to purge if you had a Delta P
light. We ended up violating every s i ngle one of t he ca.r-
dinal rules that we had.
I think the t hing to note about the entire electrical
syst em was the f ine work done on the ground. They came up
with solutions. They evidently were running s imilar t ype
cel ls a t MAC, St. Louis, and they kept them working
f or l onger than they should have.
Fuel cel l operation, as far as I was concerned , Section 1
was i deal. Section 1 maintained its share of the load the
whole fl ight. Section 2, we lost stacks 2-A and 2-C
event ual l y, I believe on about the 12th day. I was a
little concerned on the 13th day with the sta t us of Secti on 1
because we had had a delta Plight on Section 1 f or t he
firs t time and we had been running almost 24 hours.
But, t he ground came through and read us up a technical
report from St. Louis that explained the whol e thing. I t
made me feel a lot easier when they did that. Rather than
having t he ground comment blindly on it, "the fuel cells
are going to be good for 24 hours," I would like t o get a

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.