Documents / Official release

Gemini 7 Technical Debriefing, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 222 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini 7 technical debriefing, dated December 23, 1965, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It was made from tape recordings of the crew debriefing held December 19 to 21, 1965 at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. In it, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell go through countdown, powered flight, insertion, station keeping with the booster, systems, experiments and training. The table of contents also lists a section on visual sightings during orbital flight.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: December 19-21, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 7 flight crew debriefing conducted December 19-21, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Lights and flashes are mentioned and there is discussion about having proper illumination for vehicle docking. Borman and Lovell discuss celestial and terrestrial observational anomalies and note sightings of Mercury, meteors, aurora, and lightning. They also discuss not being able to see any stars once the Sun comes up.

  • p. 9 …12.4 Mission Rules ............. .. ......•. .. ......177 12,5 Experiments••.•..•••••.•...•......•...•....•177 13.0 MISSION CONTROL 13.1 GO…
  • p. 39 …It resulted in a left yaw rate and this continued periodi cally throughout the mission. It…
  • p. 40 30 shut down 1 we put it in a different control mode and it still fired…
  • p. 104 …The controls were adequate. Data Recording? We tried to record as much data as we could…
  • p. 131 …period mission briefing. It followed the way we were briefed. Very good. Lovell Flight controll ers…
93
:Borman I was very pleased with the entire Voice procedure operation
a.round the world. I thought they did 8J1 excellent job. We
didn1 t have a:ny problems at all. They were quiet when they
were requested to be during our sleep period.
Lovell They were outstanding.
:Borman They were outst&nding, yes.
Lovell The voice tape recorder operation was fine. There were
no hitches as far as operating the voice recorder. It was
easy to, well , that's three feet of change. We used mostly
the CONTINUOUS mode rather than the MOMEN111A.RYa I used
MOMENTA.RY when we just wa.nted to m&ke a comment. As a. mat
ter of fact, I think the MOMENTARY position does save a lot
of voice tape, because you dontt have it on and forge t it.
However, we had a procedure with the voice tape that was
going to record the quantity of urine that was dumped. And
this led us to leave the voice tape on quite a long time
when we weren't doing anything or saying anythin~-and using
quite a bit or tape. I think that i t would be helpful if
we had some sort or a little light of some sort to let you
know that t he tapes on. When we have a flow meter which was
being eval uated for future flights and might be a standard
piece of equi pment then it would certainly be nice to have

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 222 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.