Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 325 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary Part II transcript of the Gemini 5 (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division and dated September 2, 1965. It records astronauts Cooper and Conrad at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy. They discuss how the spacecraft systems worked, including the platform and the OAMS thruster failures. The transcript also covers operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, training, premission planning, and medical aspects. It was originally classified Confidential.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 30 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper and Charles “Pete” Conrad described observing debris and “snow” and “all sorts of glittering pieces of this, that and the other thing” in the “Visual Sightings” section of the document (pages 157-220).

282
see what the actual time difference ws.s. Maybe it
was just us.
Conrad They can ring that out real easy. We can improve
the reentry on the simulator a little bit, it's
different in this respect.
Cooper Okay, Crew Station. I have the same C)mment that I
made after Mercury on that . I think t::lat it is just
t oo bad that we can ' t have horizontal 3imulators be
cause that is exactly the way you are :in orbit. You
are not laying on your back, you are ~1 a horizontal
configuration. If your simulator ran horizontal you
would be standing just like you would be in orbit.
Orientation is entirely different.
Conrad I compliment the Gemini crew station on the layout of
t he para.meters that are displayed to you. I feel that
there are some other para.meters that I would like to
have seen displayed in the spacecraft throughout the
fl ight . As an example, I ha te to rely on the ground
for radiator temperatures or have them call me to
heat up a cooling loop. That type of thing is an
onboard function. It is very nice that the ground
monitors and takes care of you. The spacecraft was
extremely well layed out , and as we thought in the
simulator it turned out to be true in flight .

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 325 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.