Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 325 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary Part II transcript of the Gemini 5 (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division and dated September 2, 1965. It records astronauts Cooper and Conrad at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy. They discuss how the spacecraft systems worked, including the platform and the OAMS thruster failures. The transcript also covers operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, training, premission planning, and medical aspects. It was originally classified Confidential.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 30 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper and Charles “Pete” Conrad described observing debris and “snow” and “all sorts of glittering pieces of this, that and the other thing” in the “Visual Sightings” section of the document (pages 157-220).

  • p. 5 …303 15.3 Sea I.a.b . . .. ........ ... ....... . . ... .. . . .. . .... .. . ... 304 15. 4 Wa tches and Clocks . .. . .. ....... . ....... ...... .. . ... 304 15…
  • p. 118 …They could have s aved a good 2 or 3 pounds of weight on my sea…
  • p. 150 …A river running into a coastline and into the sea, I think, is a real excellent…
  • p. 216 …Of course, there again, we want to emphasize t hat we were there under ideal sea…
  • p. 217 …mighty nauseous if you really had rough seas. We did have just a t winge of…
  • p. 315 …3 Sea Lab FCSD Rep Conrad Cooper Conrad Cooper local. I flew l ocal once the…
24
Conrad
•
We had some thrust remaining in every axis but yaw
l eft . We had some in yaw left if you just wanted
to dump raw fuel overboard . I don ' t know whether
it was fuel or oxidizer.
Cooper Generally, what we'd do is roll and pitch to get
our yaw left .
Conrad I f we were tumbling and wanted to damp we just
waited until we translated into the right axis in
whi ch we had some authority .
Cooper The one axis that always seemed to work pretty good
so far as control authority was pitch.
Conrad Yes
Cooper Pitch up and pitch down seemed to work reasonably
well all the time.
Conrad Yes . I wonder i f that had something to do with the
pitch thruster lines on the manifold being close
to the source. Pitch was always good . Our trouble
was mainly coupling in the yaw thrusters both right
and left.
Cooper Source pressure was easy to monitor . SJurce temper
ature we could monitor and it was too CJld .

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 325 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.