Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 325 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary Part II transcript of the Gemini 5 (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division and dated September 2, 1965. It records astronauts Cooper and Conrad at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy. They discuss how the spacecraft systems worked, including the platform and the OAMS thruster failures. The transcript also covers operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, training, premission planning, and medical aspects. It was originally classified Confidential.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 30 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper and Charles “Pete” Conrad described observing debris and “snow” and “all sorts of glittering pieces of this, that and the other thing” in the “Visual Sightings” section of the document (pages 157-220).

  • p. 5 …257 MISSION CONTROL 13. l GO/NO GO ••. . ... •. ....... ... ... . . . . ...... •• •. •• • ... . 261 13. 2 FLA and CLA Updates .. .. .... ... ... ....... . .. ... .. . .. 261…
  • p. 275 I Conrad We didn't always agree with Mission Control. One example--! would have l oved…
  • p. 276 …Anything else on the fuel cells , batteries, or mission control? Conrad No . 13 . 4 F'light…
  • p. 277 …Cooper I do to , but we are talking here about flight plan changes in mission controlling…
  • p. 278 …Mission Control for syst ems . I think the biggest handle you have on systems is right…
273
us a whole day and a half in flight to realized
that these experiments were going to run so
successively close t o one another. The one thing
that we were not prepared for on the ground and had
to learn in the air was how to organize a series
of di fferent experiments to run them in a row.
I ' m not sure we coul d have figured this out on the
ground .
Cooper One thing we could have done if we had had the time ,
we could have taken one of these Stateside passes
that we knew would really be cluttered and run
through it in real time .
Conrad I think the recommendation here is what
should be done in the future for a flight that
had experiments like this one . I ' d run a
sim-net- sim with Houston. We had individually
er ected and taken down and put up every experiment
enough times that we had no problem in assembling
anything. We had no problem in knowing where
everything was, we knew where everything was in the
spacecraft and we got it in the shortest amount
of time as possible even in the f light . We didn ' t
have any trouble in that way. The one thing that
we did miss was, and they have a sim net sim of
'90NFtoENll,_, "

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 325 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.