Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 325 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary Part II transcript of the Gemini 5 (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division and dated September 2, 1965. It records astronauts Cooper and Conrad at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy. They discuss how the spacecraft systems worked, including the platform and the OAMS thruster failures. The transcript also covers operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, training, premission planning, and medical aspects. It was originally classified Confidential.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 30 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper and Charles “Pete” Conrad described observing debris and “snow” and “all sorts of glittering pieces of this, that and the other thing” in the “Visual Sightings” section of the document (pages 157-220).

  • p. 1 …NW 91526 GEMINI V j Technical Debriefing Part ~I_I__________________ CLASSIFICAT:ON CHANGE o_ ----.......,,_~ s:..;;...:1…
  • p. 5 CQ t-4 F-1 DEt-4TIAL 12 . 0 PR.EMISSION PLANNING 12.1 Mission Plan…
  • p. 281 270 14,0 TRAINING 14.1 Gemini Simula tor Procedures Cooper The procedures that we went…
on the gage.
Cooper Electrical--1 don't think there was a:ny problem on
the electrical system. The problem Wc,s in the
cryogenics rather than the electrical. I should say
in the cryogenics and in the water product of the
fuel cells. These were the limiting things rather
than the electrical power we were using. As long
as you could run the fuel cells there was no limit to
the power you could pull off of them.
Conrad Let I s put that to bed right now. The GPO fluffed
powering up those fuel cells after thny ' d been
powered down . If our electrical prob:.ems didn't do
anything else, we got to cycle electr:_cal loads all
the way through the flight on those fuel cells .
As far as I'm concerned , those fuel CBlls are flight
proven. Every fuel cell in every spa<!ecraft that
goes off should carry the maximum loacl of RSS
supply so that he has all the electrieal power that
he wants to use. He can run that pla·;form, computer ,
or any combination of electrical gear that he wants
anytime during the flight. The same ·;hing with the
experiments. You ' ve got to have that platform. We
kept pinching electrical power and pinching electrical
power. I think we proved that the fu<~l cells can take
@~,FIQ~t,.~TIAl "

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 325 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.